Laserfiche WebLink
Page 19 <br />Table 5-1. Geomechanics Properties <br />_) <br />Stratigraphic Unit RQD* Intact Elastic Poisson's Reduction Rock Mass <br />Modulus** Ratio ** Factor Elastic Modulus <br />(Psi) (Psi) <br />Uinta Formation 60 1.66E+06 0.17 0.18 305440.0 <br />R-8 60 2.89E+06 0.25 0.18 531760.0 <br />A-Groove 28 2.13E+06 0.21 0.14 296496.0 <br />R-7 47 1.00E+06 0.35 0.17 165800.0 <br />B-Groove 1~ 2.91E+OS 0.31 0.12 35211.0 <br />R-6 31 1.00E+06 0.3~ 0.14 143400.0 <br />L-5 43 2.91E+OS 0.31 0.16 46618.2 <br />DS-RB, RB-BB, OSMB 90 5.63E+OS 0.35 0.73 413382.8 <br />RB 90 7.00E+04 0.40 0.73 51397.5 <br />UBB 90 5.91E+OS 0.19 0.73 433941.8 <br />R-5 84 1.00E+06 0.35 0.57 574050.0 <br />50'rubblizedmaterial*** 0 NA 0.19 NA 7000.0 <br />160' rubblized material 5 2.91E+0~ 0.31 0.11 31137.0 <br />DS-Dissolution surface <br />RB-Rubber bed <br />OSMB-Oil shale mazker bed <br />UBB-Upper Boies Bed <br />* Data from 26-88-1 and regional sources <br />* * Data from 26-88-1 <br />*** Typical sand and gravel material <br />of sand and gravel because of the expected high porosity of the caved zone. The elastic proper- <br />ties for the material in the 160-ft caving zone are calculated assuming an RQD in the caving azea <br />reduced to 5. The material properties for the caving zone are also listed in Table 5-1. <br />Figures 5-I and 5-2 show the material models assigned to the various Stratigraphic units <br />and.the caving zone. The figures aze cross sections of the long solution cavities. Only the right- <br />hand half of the 800-ft panel was simulated, with a symmetry condition imposed on the left-hand <br />boundary. For the two-panel analysis, the line of symmetry bisected the 200-ft barrier pillar, and <br />only the 160-ft-high rubblized case was analyzed. <br />The in situ vertical stress was assumed to be in equilibrium with the weight of the overly- <br />ing strata, and the two components of the horizontal stress equal to 70% of the vertical stress. <br />This stress field is the same as that used in our earlier analysis (Agapito Associates, Inc. 1990) <br />and is consistent with the few stress measurements made in the Piceance Creek Basin (Wolff et <br />al. 1974 and Mitchell 1981). <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />