My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP14684
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP14684
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:44:29 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:29:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
8/21/1996
Doc Name
1995 AHR Review
From
DMG
To
Twentymile Coal Company
Annual Report Year
1995
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 <br />FAX: (3031832-8106 <br />August 21, 1996 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAI. <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />Mr. Karl Koehler lames S. LOChhead <br />Executive Director <br />Twentymile COdl CO. Michael B. Long <br />29587 ROUtt CO. Rd. # 27 Division Director <br />Oak Creek, CO. 80467 <br />RE: 1995 Annual Hydrology Report Review <br />Foidel Creek Mihe <br />/}C-82-056 <br />Dear Mr. Koehler: <br />The Division has completed review of the 1995 Annual Hydrology <br />Report (AHR) for the Foidel Creek mine. Please respond to each <br />item as appropriate. <br />General Comments <br />1. The October date in Table 1 for well 009-79-4 is represented <br />as 10/26/95. Should this date read 10/26/94? <br />2. No elevation information is shown on Figure 2 for well FBR- <br />11B. <br />3. Figure 85 y-axis is labeled incorrectly as (cfs). <br />4. Figure No. 28 y-axis is labeled Field Conductivity but TDS is <br />plotted on the graph and labeled on the heading. Please <br />Clarify and/or correct. <br />5. Historic flow and/or level information should be included in <br />the summary tables for each site in future AHR's, similar to <br />the historical summary for the water quality parameters. The <br />Division approved of TCC submitting only current year data, if <br />it was included with summary tables representing the historic <br />data for each site. This was done to reduce AHR size and <br />eliminate repetition. However, to justify this type of <br />reporting, we need complete summary information .for all <br />parameters, including flow and water level. - <br />Monitoring ~'reauencv <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.