My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP14599
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP14599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:44:25 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:28:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/17/2006
Doc Name
Annual Status Report
From
Southwestern Ecological Services
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Schmidt respectfully requests that the Land Board ask the owners of all active oil and <br />gas lines clearly mark the lines so other parties will know where the lines are located. Having <br />these lines marked will enhance the safety of other users of the land. <br />Other Islands and Riparian Forest Recovery: Another concern of the Corps was with the <br />recovery of the riparian forest, as well as the islands. This would not be such a severe problem if it <br />were not for the impact of cattle browsing the new cottonwoods. Although slight recovery of the <br />forest is occurring in spite of the cattle impact, that recovery is no where close to what is needed to <br />see full recovery and perpetuation of the forest along the stream. The number of new trees that <br />actually have a potential to become mature trees is faz less than that required to replace losses of <br />older, senescent trees. <br />Considerations of corrective actions were various. The Land Board cancelled the grazing <br />lease, but the lessee was able to obtain a stay of eviction through the courts. Therefore, the grazing <br />impact continues until the case is settled in the courts which may not occur unti12007. Fencing of the <br />entire stream corridor, except for a few specific crossings, was considered but the cost and <br />maintenance problems of such fencing was considered prohibitive. Furthermore, fencing the entire <br />corridor would likely interfere with migration patterns of the resident Pronghorn herd which <br />frequently move back and forth across the stream corridor. <br />SchmidYs ecological consultant suggested utilizing fenced islands of suitable woody <br />vegetation habitats along the stream. This would provide a protected reservoir of plant materials to <br />provide a means for rapid expansion of the forest if the cattle were ever removed from the land. <br />Although this approach does not preserve the riparian forest, it does provide a means to preserve <br />sufficient young plant materials to effect expansion in the future. <br />Five locations were selected with the concurrence of the Corps and the Land Board. These <br />ranged from a young habitat in Section 25 where both willow and cottonwood aze beginning to take <br />hold to older azeas further north where larger plants aze present but have been severely damaged by <br />the cattle. These azeas were fenced with 3-strand bazbed wire and will be analyzed annually for <br />documenting the vegetation development. Analysis will be quantitative primarily monitoring woody <br />plant biomass changes as indicated by measurements of cover and height along permanent line <br />intercepts established to cross the primary orientation of the woody vegetation stands. Those stands <br />generally run in a north-south direction, more or less pazalleling the stream. Thus, the line intercepts <br />will generally run in an east-west direction. The first measurements will be made during the summer <br />and eazly fall of 2006 and then at least once a yeaz thereafter until the condition established by <br />agreement between the Corps of Engineers and Schmidt is achieved. The cost of the fencing was <br />$16,000 which was shazed equally between Schmidt and Jones Fine Sand. <br />MINING ACTIVITY IN THE LAST YEAR: <br />1. Depth of mining - All mining is fully within the limitations. Some locations in the pits <br />west of the main road aze quite deep because the sand goes that deep, but as has been shown <br />in the past, these can be backfilled and graded to the proper standazds. Because no original <br />elevations were taken to determine the precise pre-mining topography, as will be done in <br />completely new areas, it is difficult to determine exactly what the actual depth is compared to <br />the original elevation. All other mining azeas aze well within the limits. <br />Status report for 2006 (July 15, 2006) Page 6 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.