REP14599 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

June was extraordinarily hot and dry. By the end of June, the weather station at DIA had received only 2.15 inches of moisture since January 1, well below the amount received during that period in 2002. The Coal Creek azea received one fairly good rain late in June, but it did not produce any noticeable flow in the stream. On June 30, soils along the stream were still dry to a depth of three to four inches and only minimally moist below that depth. Vegetation growth in the prairie grasses and forbs during the spring of 2006 was essentially zero. In only the more moist locations was any significant growth evident. This was worse than what was seen in 2002 when at least there was some greening during the spring, followed by a rapid onset of dormancy. In 2006, winter dormancy was hardly even broken. The spectaculaz wildflower display of 2005 was essentially zero in 2006 when even finding a wildflower blooming on the prairie was a raze event and then only the most drought tolerant species showed any amount of bloom. Most of that was gone by the third week of June with all growth ceasing except for minimal growth of Blue Grama. Not even the cheatgrass that was so abundant in 2005 could withstand the drought. What little cheatgrass did grow was very small and much of it did not even have enough moisture to produce seed. When even cheatgrass, a very aggressive and opportunistic species, won't grow then one can conclude the soil is unbelievably dry. At the very end of June 2006 and eazly in July this dryness changed. An intense and eazly monsoon arrived from Mexico and rains fell often and abundantly. However, by this time the soil was so depleted of moisture much of the precipitation that fell simply ran off rather than soaking in. It will take many weeks of frequent rains to replenish the moisture deficit in the topsoil and subsoil depletion is so severe at this time it will likely take years to rechazge that critical soil horizon. Predictions by NOAA show that it will require about 150% of normal precipitation for the next six months to just ameliorate the drought already present. They also predict that there is no better than a 5% to 10% chance of that happening. With normal precipitation it would take approximately a yeaz to ameliorate the drought and much longer to end the drought. These predictions are based on replenishment of topsoil only -not subsoil. Studies after the Dust Bowl showed that it took about ten years to replenish subsoils in Kansas and Oklahoma and southern Nebraska while northeastern Colorado took even longer. In short, 2006 has, so far, been one of the most severe drought conditions seen in the Denver basin in perhaps the last five hundred to perhaps a thousand years or possibly more. So faz, it is much worse than 2002 or the Dust Bowl yeazs. Without a return to faz above normal precipitation on a consistent and persistent basis there is little chance the effects of the drought conditions will change any time soon. Hopefully, the change in the lazge scale weather patterns that began at the very end of June 2006 will persist, but NOAA is not hopeful that will be the case. In fact, most predictions consider a retum to near normal precipitation is about the best than can be expected over the long term. 2. Topsoiling - A. Locations of topsoiling - Two locations, totaling 15.86 acres, were topsoiled (and seeded) in the last yeaz. These aze shown on the Operation Status Map. The locations aze sepazated by undisturbed land. B. Depth of topsoiling - Topsoiling was unusually deep due to the shallowness of the pits that were reclaimed and the locations of the original pits. These pits were on Status report for 2006 (July 15, 2006) Page 9 of 13