My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP14161
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP14161
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:44:10 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:23:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/18/1993
Doc Name
CONSTRUCTION STATUS REPORT SAN LUIS PROJECT TAILINGS DISPOSAL AREA PHASE I RAISE I
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />San Luis Project - Phase 11 Raise 1 Expansion Conawction States Report <br />' densify. As the tailings densify, the permeability is reduced and results in a low permeability <br />barrier to downwazd seepage migration from subsequent tailings deposition. Critical to the <br />performance of this deposition technique is the rate at which the tailings layers aze deposited. <br />' The rate of deposition must be slow enough to allow for the evaporation and desiccation to <br />occur. <br />During the initial stages of tailings discharge into the facility, the geometric configuration of the <br />' disposal area did not allow for a slow enough rate of tailings deposition for full desiccation to <br />occur. Therefore the embankment was designed using the fully drained embankment dam <br />concept to provide a pathway for interstitial water to escape from these tailings in addition to <br />' the drainage blanket overlying the liner. In addition, during the startup of the facility prior to <br />the development of a beach of tailings against the embankment, the potential existed for free <br />water (from deposition and storm events) to impound against the fill. The design therefore <br />initially incorporated conventional water retaining dam design for which a zoned, filter <br />compatible structure was requ1red. <br />1 <br />With the tailings beach against the fill and a free water pond remote from the embaNcment, the <br />Phase I requirements for water retention no longer exist. The use of a zoned fill was therefore <br />not considered necessary for the Phase II raises. <br />' As the quantity of tailings in the impoundment increased, the rate of deposition, or rate of rise, <br />decreased and allowed for the full thin-lift, subaerial deposition processes occur. Thus, the <br />' ability of the embankment to allow drainage from the tailings to occur became less critical as <br />the tailings level in the facility increased. Prior to the need for the embankment raise, very little <br />' or diminimus amounts of the slurry water aze actually drained through the embankment. The <br />water which does drain into the embankment comes only from the tailings immediately adjacent <br />' to the embankment. <br />Conswction of the main, Phase I, embankment consisted of a zoned earthfill incorporating Type <br />2 material, similar to the material currently utilized to construct the raise, in the upstream shell <br />of the embankment. This material was also required as a filter to prevent piping of tailings into <br />the embankment fill. Field work conducted prior to construction of the raise has demonstrated <br />a mazked lack of saturated horizons within the tailings deposited adjacent to the Phase I <br />embankment. In fact, the tailings in this area aze less saturated than was anticipated during the <br />' October, 1993 16 SRK Project No. 14725 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.