Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 portion of the State by the drought of recent years. No other flows were detected at any monitoring <br />station. The TDS of the single flow detected this year was 444 mg/I. <br />As in all previously monitored water years, no discharges occurted from the Refuse Area ponds, and <br />therefore, no flows were measured or sampled at SW23-1 during this water year. <br />2.2.2 Ground Water Monltorlnp Data Groundwater monitoring data consists of water levels <br />measurements. Tabulation of the raw data is included in Appendix C. Hydrographs for the 15 <br />stations (monitor holes) from which water level data was collected are included in Appendix D. <br />Table 2-2 is a statistical summary of the water level data. <br />2.2.2.1 Alluvial Water Level Data Water level data has been collected from the one remaining <br />' original alluvial aquifer monitoring hole (QAL-5) and the Refuse Disposal Area alluvial monitoring <br />hole (RM-1). Five other alluvial monitoring holes were inundated by Kenney Reservoir. A hydro- <br />' graph of the water level data for QAL-5 is contained in Appendix E. The statistical summary of the <br />water level data for QAL-5 is also included in Table 2-2. No water has yet been detected in RM-1. <br />The locations of these monitoring holes are shown on Plate 1 in the pocket of this report. The Qal-5 <br />' hydrograph shows the major increase in the alluvial water level of the White River during the first <br />half of 1985. This rise was due to the filling of Kenney Reservoir. Since that time, fluctuations <br />reflect the rise and fall of the reservoir level. <br />' 2.2.2.2 Alluvial Water Quality Data The water qualiiy data for QAL-5 is contained in Appendix <br />t E. The statistical summary of the data is also contained in Appendix E. A statistical summary of <br />depths for QAL-5 is also included in Table 2-2. The fifth annual hydrology report noted that the <br />general increase in the average TDS that started when Kenney Reservoir was filled was beginning <br />' to slow down. Based on the data collected during the present water year, the TDS continues to <br />decrease. The TDS ranged from 5940 mg/I to 5388 mg/I with an average of 5637. This compares <br />to an average during the previous reporting period of 6390 mgA. A graph showing the magnesium, <br />chloride and TDS levels for QAL-5 is also included in Appendix E. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />' 6 <br />1 <br />