Laserfiche WebLink
~.~, <br />III III III III IIII III r <br />~/- ~7b <br />DISTRICT COURT. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER. CCLORADC <br />Lase No. B2CV3312 <br />RESPONSE TG PLAINTIFFS' GBJECTION TG BILL FCR CCSTS At,G <br />ATTORNEYS' FEES <br />LEONARD LOUKONEN, et al .• <br />Plaintiffs. <br />~. <br />I<T~~~f~~B.~ <br />MAY 11 1983 <br />COLORADO MINED LAND RECLANA7fON BOARD. et al•• MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />Defendants. Colo. Dept. of Natural Resource <br />Plaintiffs filed. on or about April 25. 1983. an objec- <br />tion to bill for costs and attorneys' fees and motion for <br />reconsideration of award of attorneys' fees, with an accorrFa- <br />Hying affidavit of one John P. Tracy. who is identified <br />only as a licensed attorney. <br />Plaintiffs assert that the attorneys' fees billed by <br />defendants are "excessive and unreasonable." Objections at <br />1 para. 2. Defendants do not Detail with any particularity. <br />either in their objection or in the affidavit of Mr. Tracy. <br />the basis of their objection. To the extent that such a <br />basis may be deduced. it appears to be twofold: (1) that a <br />suit for judicial review of a 54,000 penalty should have <br />~~ <br />been viewed by defendants as inconsequential and defended <br />