My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP13475
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP13475
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:43:45 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:13:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1986 AHR text
Annual Report Year
1986
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bar graphs depicting spring flows from 1979 to present have been included for <br />the 1986 Annual Hydrology Report and are contained in Appendix D. <br />Springs were monitored when accessible and the records for the most part are <br />good. In early spring G-25, G-28a, and G-31 were made inaccessible by <br />landslides in Lone Pine Gulch and on the road to the springs. <br />1.3 Ground Water Monitorin4 <br />' During Water Year 1986 water levels were monitored monthly at 30 wells when <br />weather permitted. The location of these wells are shown on F~chibit I. <br />Wells included in the hydrology monitoring program for water year 1986 are shown <br />' in Table 1.2-2 along with monitoring frequency, type, and sampling. <br />Groundwater well tronitoring data such as water level (if present), quality, <br />' dates, and other pertinent information is contained in the Quarterly Hydrology <br />Monitoring Reports. Well hydrographs for the 1986 water monitoring quarters are <br />also contained in the reports. These hydrographs are cumulative for the year. <br />' Monthly water level records were near complete at all locations. There has been <br />a constant problem over the last 2 years with an obstruction in well 38-H-2 <br />which has caused sane lost data as the electric level probe will not always go <br />' past the obstruction and gets hung up on the way out. Wells 38-H-1 and 38-H-3 <br />also are problematic in than crorulensation of moisture inside the casing acts as <br />a water level and causes the electric probe to malfunction before it reaches the <br />' water. This has caused considerable lost data in well 38-H-3 and to a much <br />lesser extent in 38-H-1 <br />Nbnitoring of wells WR-2 and WR-3 was discontinued upon approval from the <br />' Division in the 3rd quarter of 1985. <br />Water cascading down the casing in well SCM-13 caused a "no-reading" in April. <br />' This has happened several times during spring runoff in previous years. Well <br />GP-2 at the lower refuse pile area was inadvertently destroyed by construction <br />in late December or Farly January as it was covered with snow. There are no <br />' plans to replace this well as it is located in the interior area of the refuse <br />pile and was drilled as a test hole. <br />1.4 Mine Water Monitoring <br />I As in 1965 a mine inflow survey was conducted during water year 1986. An <br />underground mine map with inflow areas and sample locations delineated is <br />I included as FSChibit III. The mine inflow survey was conducted June, 1986 to <br />more closely assess peak inflows from spring runoff. The mine inflow survey <br />looked at all previous inflow areas as well as all area mined since the last <br />survey in December of 1985. The three main areas from the previous survey which <br />1 had produced sustained inflows in excess of 3 gpm remained active in 1986 but at <br />(4) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.