Laserfiche WebLink
11111111 <br /> II1 IIIIIII1 <br />f'~ <br />V V <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1713 Sherman St., Raom 215 <br />Denver, CO 80205 <br />Phone: 13031 8663567 <br />FAX: 13031832-81D6 <br />September 25, 1992 <br />Mr. Jim Stover <br />Minrec, Inc. <br />2768 Compass Drive, Suite 101 <br />Grand Junction, CO 81506 <br />OF' COQ <br />a"'. ~g <br />.,~;~; <br />'ie <br />Rov Rom¢r <br />Governor <br />~Hichael B. tong <br />Drvis~on Director <br />RE: 1991 Annual Hydrologic Report (AHR) Review; Red Canyon Mine; <br />File No. C-81-034 <br />Dear Mr. Stover; <br />The Division has reviewed the 1991 Annual Hydrologic Report for the <br />Red Canyon Mine. The required frequency of monitoring all surface <br />and ground water sites has been met. <br />Surface Water- The data for the Upper and Lower Ward Creek stations <br />has been reviewed. The monthly average is helpful in comparing <br />current flows. Seasonal flows are evident, however it is difficult <br />to make a conclusion regarding impacts because of the times that <br />readings are taken in May. But there appears to be no impact to <br />Ward Creek from mining. <br />Because of the limited amount of data for the conductivity of <br />Springs 1 and 3, it is difficult to make a determination of impacts <br />from the mining operation. As the data accumulates, it should <br />become easier to make a determination. Conductivity for Spring 1 <br />is lower, as compared to the historical data. Spring 3 shows a <br />higher average conductivity as compared to the historical data, but <br />has not reached the historical high of 666 mmhos/cm. There appears <br />to be no indication that water from flooded mine workings are <br />discharging to the glacial-alluvial aquifer. <br />In May 1991, TSS for SP-D was 2180 mg/1 and at SP-DA, TSS increased <br />to 2765 mg/1. This increase may indicate degradation, due to an <br />increased sediment load from the mine site. However, since no <br />water was discharged from the pond during this water year, there <br />must be some other explanation for the increase in TSS. In the <br />AHR, a possible explanation is due to the high flow which may have <br />further eroded the ditch banks between the two monitoring points. <br />The Division plans to inspect this channel during future <br />inspections. The data obtained in the future for the Carbon Ditch <br />should be watched closely for increases of TSS. There appears to <br />be no impact to the Carbon Ditch by surface runoff from the mine site. <br />