My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP13356
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP13356
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:43:41 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:11:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/9/2007
Doc Name
2006 ARR Review Responses
From
J.E. Stover & Associates Inc
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J. E. STOVER & ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />P.O. BOX 60340 <br />GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81506 <br />PHONE: {970) 245-4101, FAX 242-7908 <br />MINE ENGINEERING <br />MINE RECLAMATION <br />April 5, 2007 <br />Mr. Dan Mathews <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />101 South 3rd, Suite 301 <br />Grand Junction, CO 81501 <br />Re: Snowcap Coal Company, Inc. <br />2006 Annual Reclamation Report <br />Evaluation Review Response <br />Permit No. C-1981-041 <br />Dear Mr. Mathews: <br />CNIL ENGINEERING <br />CONST.MANAGEMENT <br />RECEIVED <br />APR 0 9 2007 <br />Divis~r~~ of P,ecla~~~anon. <br />Mining erd Safety <br />The DRMS' letter dated March 19, 2007 transmitted its evaluation review comments <br />regarding the referenced annual report. Following are Snowcap's responses to the <br />DRMS' comments. <br />Annual Reclamation Report <br />1. On page 2 of the report, under Item (e), please include reference to the <br />herbicide used in association with the tamarix removal project. <br />SCC: Enclosed is revised page 2 of the 2006 Annual Reclamation Report with <br />reference to the herbicide that was used in the tamarix removal. <br />Revegetation Evaluation Report <br />2. Toward the end of page 2 and continuing on page 3 of the revegetation report <br />prepared by Cedar Creek Associates, Inc., there is discussion of the species <br />diversity standard. Narrative on page 2 does not accurately reflect one aspect of <br />the standard. The report references the standard as specifying that "no reclaimed <br />area shall have a single species that represents> 70% relative cover". In <br />actuality, the approved standard states: <br />No reclaimed area shall have a single species that represents greater <br />than 70% relative cover, with the exception of annual grasses. The <br />annual grass component shall not exceed 70% relative cover unless the <br />annual grass component in the corresponding reference area also <br />exceeds 70%. In such instances, the relative cover of the annual grass <br />component of the reclaimed area shall not exceed the relative cover of <br />the annual grass component in the reference area by more than 5%. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.