My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP12711
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP12711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:43:19 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:00:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/29/2006
Doc Name
2005 AHR Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Savage & Savage
Annual Report Year
2005
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Require- <br /> ment <br /> Require- complied <br />Requirement ment with ~ (yes Comment <br /> citation <br /> nolindeterm <br /> -inate <br /> Should any degradation occur, the following two aquifers are <br /> the most likely to be degraded by mining at Carbon Junction: the <br /> Animas River alluvium (400 ft. downslope from the mine) and <br /> the Pictured Cliffs Sandstone (subcrops beneath the mine pit). <br /> Alluvial aquifers: Animas River alluvial water can be expected <br /> to have not been degraded by mining because the less than l0- <br /> acre surface area of spoil at the mine would not generate enough <br />Basic <br />T CWQCC leachate to overcome the dilutional effect of native alluvial <br />. <br />Standards regulation ground water. <br />for Ground s yes Bedrock aquifers: Downgradient monitoring well 95-1 was <br /> <br />Wa[er 41.4 and <br />drilled in 1/94 to total depth 350 ft. Although its perforated <br /> 41 5 depths are unavailable, presumably it was perforated like <br /> reclaimed well 94-1 i.e. top to bottom. The presumed perforated <br /> interval of well 95-1 extends through sandstone beds in the <br /> Fruitland formation and the Pictured Cliffs sandstone. The well <br /> is within the expected flowpath of any coal spoil leachate that <br /> would be generated in the Carbon Junction backfilled pits. Well <br /> 95-1 has not shown evidence of leachate. <br />U. Restoration <br />of ground <br />water CDMG Carbon Junction's approximate 100-acre surface disturbance <br />recharge to regulation yes probably is not enough to diminish recharge to aquifers. <br />approximate 4.05.11(3) <br />premining <br />rate <br />V. Prevention of <br />adverse <br />impacts to CDMG Compliance with the Basic Standards for Ground Water (see <br />ground water regulation yes item T, above) and no impacts to recharge indicate compliance <br />systems 4.05.1 l with 4.05.11. <br />outside the <br />ermit area <br />W. Preventio <br />n of impacts <br />to ground CDMG The postmining land uses of rangeland, wildlife habitat, and <br />water that regulation dryland farming will not use ground water. Consequently, any <br />adversely s <br />YeS <br />impact to ground water will not impact the postmining land use in <br />impact the 4.05.1(2) the permit area. <br />postmining and <br />land use 4.05.11 <br />within the <br />ermit area <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.