Laserfiche WebLink
set of points along coordinates in one direction and then sample them in reverse order. However, <br />orientation protocol was always maintained (i.e. in the direction of the next point to be physically <br />sampled). If the boundary of an area was encountered before reaching the full length of a transact, the <br />orientation of the transact was turned 90° in the appropriate direction so the transact could be <br />completed. In this manner, boundary transacts were retained entirely within the target unit by <br />"bouncing" off the boundaries. Production quadrats were always oriented 90° to the right (clockwise) of <br />the ground cover transact and placed one meter from the starting point so as to avoid any trampled <br />vegetation. Because sample adequacy for ground cover measurement is typically reached well in <br />advance of production measurement, any sample point evenly divisible by 3 was skipped for cover. This <br />protocol was maintained for al! revegetation sample points, however, with regard to the reference area, <br />ground cover sampling ceased once both a minimum and adequate sample had been collected. <br />2.2 Determination of Ground Cover <br />Ground cover at each sample point was determined utilizing the point-intercept methodology as <br />illustrated on Figure 1. As indicated in this figure, Cedar Creek utilizes new state-of-the-art <br />instrumentation it has pioneered to facilitate much more rapid and accurate collection of data. A transact <br />of 10 meters length was extended in the direction of the next sampling location from the flagged center <br />of each systematically locaked sample point At each one-meter interval along the transact, a "laser point <br />bar" was situated parallel to, and approximatey 4.5 to 5.0 feet vertically above the ground surface. A set <br />of 10 readings was recorded as to hits on vegetation (by species), litter, rods (>2mm), or bare soil. Hits <br />were determined at each meter interval by activating a battery of 10 low-energy specialized lasers" <br />situated along the bar at 10 centimeter intervals and recording the variable intercepted by each of the <br />narrowly focused (0.02' beams (see Figure 1). In this manner, a total of 100 intercepts per transact <br />were recorded resulting in i percent cover per intercept. All reclaimed area vegetation as well as the <br />majority of reference area vegetation (especialy herbaceous and shrub strata) was subject to sampling. <br />This methodology and instrumentation facilitates the collection of the most unbiased, repeatable, and <br />precise ground cover data possible. Identification and nomenclature of plant species follows Weber and <br />Wittman's Coorado Flora: Western sloce -Revised Edition; 1996; University Press of Colorado. Niwot <br />Colorado. <br />" Lasers utilized for this instrument are stateof-the-art and of specalized design to emit a unique electro-magnetic <br />wavelength visible under full suniigM, a conddion previously not possible with portable low-energy lasers. <br />~~~ ~~rc ma§®en,a~xs~ tnc. Page 7 Blue Ribbon Mine- Revegetatlon Evaluation <br />