My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP12275
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP12275
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:43:05 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:52:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/6/2005
Doc Name
2004 AHR Review Memo
From
Tom Kaldenbach
To
File
Annual Report Year
2004
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rock and sediment, then the leachate will migrate from the backfill to adjacent rock and <br />sediment. (a clay liner will prevent leachate migration from A and B pits where the <br />backfill material is ash.) The migration of spoil leachate from A pit will occur through <br />the interconnected, intergranular pores (effective porosity) in the backfill, rock, and <br />sediment. The migration will be gravity-driven, and will be controlled by the inherent <br />capacity of the rock to transmit water (the hydraulic conductivity). The velocity of this <br />subsurface migration will be limited by the hydraulic conductivity and the hydraulic <br />gradient in receiving aquifers, downgradient. In the confined Laramie aquifer (sandstone <br />and coal beds), the Darcy equation can be used to predict that the velocity of leachate and <br />ground water flow will be on the order of 1 ft. per yeaz, as calculated in Table 1. The <br />Darcy equation cannot be used to predict the ground water flow velocity in Ennis Draw <br />alluvium or eolian sand because these units are unconfined. Ground water flow velocity <br />in the Ennis Draw alluvium can be expected to be on the order of 170 ft. per yeaz as <br />documented for similar hydrogeologic conditions in the High Plains aquifer of eastern <br />Colorado. The direction of all subsurface flow (leachate and ground water) would be <br />northeast from A pit towazd Ennis Draw alluvial monitoring well DH-96, approximately <br />6,000 fr. downgradient from the pits. <br />Potential for /eachate discharge from mine backfill to land surface. The relatively flat <br />topography of the reclaimed pit areas and subsurface migration would prevent significant <br />formation of surface spoil leachate springs or seeps at the Keenesburg Mine. The <br />relatively flat topography of the reclaimed pit areas would prevent significant formation <br />of surface ash leachate springs or seeps at the Keenesburg Mine. <br />Potential for degradation of ground water in rock and sediment next to mine site. As <br />spoil leachate migrates through the subsurface from A pit through adjacent sediment and <br />rock, it will mix with ground water along the flow path and load the ground water with <br />dissolved solids. The amount of loading will diminish with distance from the pit, as the <br />leachate becomes diluted by ground water the leachate mixes with along the migration <br />pathway. This dilution process along the migration pathway is called dispersion, and can <br />be thought of as a repeated series of cycles of mixing of ground water with leachate. In <br />each mixing cycle the leachate will become successively more dilute, and eventually the <br />leachate will approach the composition of the native ground water. <br />Eolian sand and Ennis Draw alluvium -Table 2 shows calculations of resulting <br />leachate concentrations resulting from successive mixing cycles in the sand and <br />alluvium. TDS and SAR of leachate will be diluted to within 25% of uncontaminated <br />ground water afer one dilution cycle. If a dilution cycle in the alluvium and sand <br />occurs within 100 ft. of the pit, then a significant leachate plume in the alluvium and <br />sands would not extend more than 100 ft. downgradient from the pit. SAR values <br />would also be less than the potential impairment level of SAR 10 after one dilution <br />cycle. A plume would take less than one year to form (after complete saturation of <br />backfill), based on the 170 f11yr flow velocity mentioned above. The plume would <br />spread out (attenuate) vertically and laterally along its flow path in the alluvium and <br />sand. This attenuation would further reduce the concentration of the plume. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.