My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP12019
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP12019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:42:57 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:48:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/22/1996
Doc Name
1994 & 1995 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT REVIEW MINE 1 MINE 2 ECKMAN PARK C-81-071
From
DMG
To
COLO YAMPA COAL CO
Annual Report Year
1994
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
` t • • III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Dcpanmenl of Natural Resources <br />1317 Sherman St., Room ? 15 ~I~~~ <br />Denver, Color. ria 80?O7 <br />Nhune: 13031 866-7567 <br />FA% (3071872-8106 <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />November 22, 1996 NATURAL <br />Mr. Rick Mills <br />RESOURCE <br />Colorado Yampa Coal Co. co a goer <br />29587 Routt Co. Rd. # 27 lames s. Lo<nheaa <br /> <br />Oak Creek, CO. 80467 Executive Dveaor <br /> Michael B Long <br /> Division Dneclor <br />RE: 1994 and 1995 Mnual Hydrology Report Review, Mine 1, Mine 2, Eckman Park, #C- <br />81-071 <br />Dear Mr. Mills: <br />The Division has completed review of the 1994 and 1995 Annual Hydrology Report for <br />Mine 1, Mine 2, and Eckman Park. Please respond to each item as appropriate. <br />General Comments <br />Overall, a great improvement was noted with regard to meeting the required frequency of <br />visits and taking the required sample. Site visits were generally conducted in accordance <br />with the approved plan with very few misses noted. <br />The following discrepancies were noted: <br />~~- 1. In the 1994 AHR, the discussion under the water quality heading for bedrock wells <br />is missing. <br />~~ 2. In the 1995 AHR text, the statement is made "..only one significant spoil spring was <br />observed in 1995...? Is this statement accurate? <br />3. The 1994 report indicates via Figure 7 that well 026-94-M001 had a October TDS of <br />approximately 800 mg/I. The 1995 report via Figure 7 indicates that the October <br />1994 TDS was 500 mg/I for this well. Which is correct and why do the two reports <br />r ' show different results on the Figures for the same date? <br />~~rV 4. The 1994 report indicates via Figure 7 that well 026-94-M002 had a October TDS of <br />approximately 1200 mg/l. The 1995 report via Figure 7 indicates that the October <br />1994 TDS was 750 mg/I for this well. Which is correct and why do the two reports <br />show different results on the Figures for the same date? <br />5. For sites reporting water level, no data sheets were provided (302, 304, 307). In the <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.