My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP11948
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP11948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:42:54 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:48:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/9/2001
Doc Name
2000 ANNUAL RECLAMATION AND HYDROLOGY REPORT
From
MONTGOMERY WATSON MINING GROUP
To
COLO DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DEPAR'T'MENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIItONMENT <br />WATER QUAI.TfY CONTROL DIVISION <br />Water Quality Proteetiom Section <br />Memonmdmm <br />~~ To: File <br /> From: Jon Kubic ~~ <br />w~ <br />Date: Se <br />tember 28 <br />1999 <br /> p <br />, <br />~ Subject: Inactivation Request <br />~ H-G Coal Company Hayden Gulch Mine <br /> CDPS No. COG-SSOOl8 <br />~~ Routt County <br /> <br />-i The permittee has requested inactivation. <br /> The Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) has recently granted release of Phase II and <br />{ Phase III bond. As a condition of this approval, the CDMG has authorized leaving the two sedimentation <br /> ponds that are the sources of the remaining discharge points under this permit for ux at livestock and <br /> wildlife watering ponds. As such, the potential for point source discharges from thex ponds will remain, <br /> however, the sources will no longer be a regulated industrial activity but anon-regulated agricultural <br />1 activity. <br />~ Additionally, during my June 1998 site visit, I observed that there arc at least three spoils springs that <br /> remain. None of these contribute significant flow and they usually do not reach either of the ponds. <br /> Because they do not impact surface water, the CDMG has jurisdiction. They have determined that these <br />_ spoils springs are not of significant concern. Thera is no basis for the Division w disagree. <br />~ <br /> On the basis of the information detailed in this letter, I recotmmend inactivation. I also recommend that <br /> the District Engineer not be requested to perform a site visit Thera would be no benefit from such a <br />1 visit. <br />.~ <br />~~ <br />-t~ <br />~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.