Laserfiche WebLink
4.1 2005 Moffat Area Inventory Results and Corrective Actions <br />Block 1: The erosion condition composite SSF was 4 in 2005, which is consistent with the composite <br />SSF assigned to this block since 2001 (Table 1). This block is therefore assigned a stable Erosion <br />Condition Class, which is consistent with the Erosion Condition Class assigned to this block since 1997. <br />There aze some remnant rills and small gullies at the lower end of this block above Block 10 in the <br />vicinity of Downdrain 3. Another gully is located neaz the north side of the old reclaimed road. These <br />features show no recent activity with most having vegetation on the sides and bottom. One gully along <br />' the southern end of Block 1 near the North Road showed some recent erosion activity. That gully will <br />be repaired by lining it with rip-rap in the 2005 fall season. No other corrective measures aze planned <br />for this block as a result of the 2005 inventory. <br />Table 1: Moffat Area Rlnck 1 F.rnsinn Condition Classification <br /> <br />Item Possible <br />Score <br />2005 <br />2004 <br />2003 <br />2002 <br />2001 <br />2000 <br />1999 <br />1998 <br />1997 <br />1996 <br />Soit Movement 14 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 3 <br />Surface Litter 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 <br />Surface Rock <br />Fra ents 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 <br />Pedestallin 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Flow Pattems ' l5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 <br />Rills l4 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 6 6 6 <br />Gullies 15 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 <br />Total 100 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 12 18 17 <br />Erosion Condition Classification: Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable <br />Block 2: The composite SSF was 4, which is consistent with composite SSF assigned since 2000 <br />(Table 2). This block is therefore stable and has been stable since 1997. One remnant gully in the <br />vicinity of Downdrain 3 remains; however, it does not show any signs of active erosion. No corrective <br />actions aze planned as a result of the 2005 inventory. <br />Table 2: Mn(fat Area Rlnck 2 F.rnsinn Condition Classification <br /> <br />[[em Possible <br />Score <br />2005 <br />2004 <br />2003 <br />2002 <br />2001 <br />2000 <br />1999 <br />1998 <br />1997 <br />1996 <br />Soil Movement 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 <br />Surface Litter 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 <br />Surface Rock <br />Fra en[s 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 <br />Pedestallin 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Flow Patterns 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 <br />Rills 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 6 <br />Gullies 15 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 6 <br />Total 100 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 12 26 <br />Erosion Condition Classification: Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Sli ht <br />' Block 3: The composite SSF was 4, which is a slight improvement over the composite SSF assigned last <br />year (Table 3). This block is stable and has been stable since 1997. Vegetation on this block was more <br />~ sparsely distributed than adjoining blocks. However, it was seeded later than the adjacent blocks with <br />6 <br />