Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Energy Fuels Mining Company <br />Raton Creek Mine <br />Permit No. C-82-055 <br />2004 <br />Annual Hydrology Repoli <br />(Reporting Period January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004) <br />Introduction <br />This Annual Hydrology Report (AHR) presents summarized hydrologic monitoring data for the <br />Raton Creek Mine operation-reclamation for the 2004 reporting period. In addition, discussion <br />and comparison of these data with previous reporting periods aze incorporated within the report. <br />The AHR is prepazed and submitted in accordance with CMLRD Rule 4.05.13. <br />Monitoring data compiled for the AHR include the period from 1987 through 2004, representing <br />the entire time that Energy Fuels has operated/reclaimed the mine. EFMC has no hydrologic <br />data from the previous mine operator on file. Required monitoring data collected and presented <br />in this AHR includes: groundwater quality and levels; diversion flow quantity and quality; and <br />quantity and quality of discharges to streams. <br />Groundwater <br />Two (2) groundwater wells aze monitored at the Raton Creek Mine, identified as the Iuppa Well <br />and the Refuse Well. Field and laboratory data collected from the monitor wells aze summarized <br />as described below. As reflected on the water quality data tables and water well level figures, <br />EFMC followed the approved monitoring schedule (revised in 2001) of semi-annual field and <br />laboratory quality sampling, and quarterly water level measurements. <br />Current and historic water quality data for the Iuppa Well and Refuse Well are shown on Tables <br />2 and 3, respectively. A review of monitoring data for each well through the period of this <br />report indicate that the monitored parameters aze within a range consistent with previous <br />monitoring data. <br />Monitoring data for the Iuppa Well indicate slightly higher levels of total alkalinity for the <br />reporting period as compazed to the average of 1987 through 2002 whereas hardness has <br />decreased. Sulfate ranged higher during the latter 1990's era but has decreased again during the <br />later reporting periods to a range that is more akin to that of the report's beginning years (late <br />1980's). <br />Refuse Well monitoring data indicate slightly higher levels of total alkalinity, temperature and <br />sodium for the reporting period as compared to the average range of previous monitoring data as <br />stated above. Manganese however, has decreased during the current reporting period. <br />The Division, in response to the 2002 AHR, requested calibrating the monitoring instrument <br />used for conductivity. Inhouse calibration to the meter showed little effect. During 2004, EFCI <br />used a different meter for monitoring the conductivity. With reference to the Iuppa Well, <br />