Laserfiche WebLink
<br />' The critical measurement required for accurate velocity determinations is the interval time between <br />' signals. Shear wave signals are acquired at known depths (in this case, 1 meter vertical separation), <br />therefore imerval time is the only unknown in the velocity calculation. Using the wave trace from one <br />depth as a time reference and visually shifting the other wave trace along the time axis, it is possible <br />' to have the reference trace overlain by the shifted trace. The time offset that is required to achieve <br />a compatible overlay is the interval time. This technique for interval determination is the <br />cross-correlation method. The shear waves generated by the hammer and auger source are referred <br />' to as S-H, since particle motion occurs in the horizontal axis (parallel to the active axis of the <br />geophone) while wave propagation is vertical and downward. The S-H waves have srmall amplitudes <br />and are thus representative of a small strain phenomenon. <br />' Shear wave velocity measurements are unaffected by the percent fines, compressibility, layering or <br />other factors that infiuence penetration resistance to a lazge degree. Shear wave velocity is a measure <br />' of the stiffness of the soil skeleton and can be used to directly calculate the elastic parameters of the <br />soil (Go, Eo and v ). Shear wave velocity is largely controlled by void ratio and stress. Recent work <br />(Robertson et al, 1992 and Sasitharan, 1993) has shown that shear wave velocity can be used to <br />' assess the state of sand. <br />4.0 SPT ENERGY CALIBRATION <br />' The results of the standard penetrarion test (SPT) energy calibrations aze shown in tabular and <br />graphical form in Append'a F. The first set of plots show the energy from the blows with the average <br />energy plotted as a line. The tables summarize the blow counts and the energy for the recorded <br />sample irttervaLs. The tables also have the equivalem N-60 blow counts for the sample Intervals. The <br />field blow count, N-60 and percent of theoretical energy are shown on the last set of plots in <br />' , Appendix F. <br />' S.0 ASSESSMENT OF STATE FOR LIQUEFIABLE SOILS <br />5.1 Concept of State <br />t In 1936, Cassagrande showed that both the peak friction angle and the volume change behavior of <br />sand depends on the initial void ratio or density of the sand. Since then Critical State Soil Mechanics <br />' has shown that sand has a critical state, a combination of void ratio and confining pressure, ai which <br />it can be sheared with esserriially zero volume change. The critical state line separates states that show <br />increases in volume when sheared (dilative) from states that show decreases in volume when sheared <br />(contractive). Recently a number of methods have been developed in order to identi8y in situ state, <br />based on the results of in situ tests. Two of these methods are presented to assist in inCerpretation of <br />the volume change behavior of potentially liquefiable soils. <br />' S.2 State Based on Qc Criterion <br />' Robertson et al (1992) have suggested that the in situ state of clean sands can be determined using <br />measured cone bearing, Qc which has been normalized to remove the effects of overburden stress. <br />' Cor>ETec, Ixc. 3 Dmva, Colorado <br /> <br />