My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP10685
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP10685
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:40:06 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:30:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/15/2002
Doc Name
2002 Erosion Inventory Report
From
WWC Engineering
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Stability Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 21: West Ridge Block 13-14 Erosion Condition Classification <br />' Possible <br />Item Score 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 <br />Soil Movement l4 0 0 0 3 0 6 5 <br />' Surface Litter 14 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 <br />Surface Rock Fragments 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 <br />Pedestalling 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />' Flow Patterns 15 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 <br />Rills 14 3 3 3 3 3 6 7 <br />Gullies 15 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 <br />Total 100 6 6 6 9 6 24 26 <br />' Erosion Condition Classification: Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Slight Slight <br />WEST RIDGE CHECK DAMS <br />' The check dams in the West Ridge-Center Ridge drainage were inspected to determine if <br />' any remedial measures needed to be performed. As a result of the inspection, corrective <br />measures are planned. <br />' GOAT TRAIL EXIT CHANNELS <br />Transects were measured at the three constructed exit channels along the Goat Trail. The <br />location of these outlets are shown on Exhibit 1, Sheet 2 of 2. The channels were measured <br />across monuments placed in 1993 and compared to evaluate erosion activity. The survey results <br />are shown graphically in Appendix A. Each of the three drainage areas had cross-section <br />' measurements taken at two locations. <br />Exit Channel 1 <br />' The cross-sections show that this feature remained stable when compared to the 2001 <br />survey data. Cross-section 2 indicates the feature is relatively stable in this section of the <br />channel with periods of agradation and degradation. No corrective measures planned as a result <br />' of the inventory. <br />Exit Channel 2 <br />Cross-section 1 shows show that this feature remained stable when compazed to the 2001 <br />monitoring data. The lower section of the channel at cross-section 2 also shows this feature <br />' remained stable when compared to the 2001 survey data. No corrective measures planned as a <br />result of the inventory. <br />Exit Channel 3 <br />Cross section 1 and cross section 2 both indicate significant agradation when compared to <br />2001 data. No corrective measures planned as a result of the inventory. <br />w <br />1' ~C Engineering <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.