My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP10543
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP10543
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:39:59 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:27:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/20/1997
Doc Name
REVIEW OF EXISTING COMPACTION DATA AND TESTING FREQUENCY FOR THE EXISTING REFUSE PILE SOUTHFIELD MIN
From
DMG
To
SUSAN BURGMAIER
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' `t `. <br />Memo to Susan Burgmaier <br />Southfield Coal Refuse Pile <br />page 5 <br />verification requirements be retained for the coarse coal refuse lifts. If the <br />MSHA District Manager concurs and approves the variance in writing it would go <br />into effect. If the MSHA District Manager approves some different variance, <br />Southfield may submit the variance as a Minor Revision for our review. <br />TerraMatrix also proposes that compaction be tested using `proof-rolling". I do <br />not believe that proof-rolling is sufficiently quantifiable and reliable to <br />recommend its acceptance as an inspection technique for application to a coal <br />refuse pile. <br />TerraMatrix also states its opinion that quarterly inspections of the Southfield <br />coal refuse pile should be adequate, based upon the current low rate of waste <br />placement. I do not disagree with this conclusion, as long as the rate of mining <br />and waste deposition do not increase. Further, TerraMatrix proposes seven <br />specific items for inclusion within the inspection reports. <br />(1) `Inspection of the entire pile for any failures." - I concur <br />(2) `Inspection of the entire pile for any springs and seeps." - I concur <br />(3) "Confirmation of lift thicknesses and placement procedures." - I concur <br />(4) "Confirm the fine and coarse refuse material being placed is consistent <br />with the material type described in the stability analysis." - 1 concur <br />(5) Confirmation of compaction by proof-rolling using a loaded dump truck and <br />noting the deflection." - I do not concur -See above comment <br />(6) `Engineer's comments and/or recommendations." - I concur <br />(7) "Descriptions of actions taken by EFCI to remedy any problems noted by <br />the engineer." - I concur <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.