Laserfiche WebLink
- ~ - <br />P1r. Robert L. Siegrist <br />December 2, 1985 <br />Page three <br />The ski lake can take on dozens of shapes, lengths, etc., if you <br />want a recreational result. Perhaps we were misled by the compe- <br />tition standards that you provided to us. We would prefer a much <br />more organic shape with bays and islands rather than the somewhat <br />stiff rectangle. You must balance your desire fora personal ski <br />lake with the long term use or existance of such a facility. Since <br />only 25% of the excavated material returns to the site in fines, <br />you are forced to consider water bodies, but, perhaps, not quite <br />so large. The longer it is, the more difficult to maintain an <br />aesthetic water level. <br />I'm not sure what else to say at this point, Bob, other than the <br />plans we prepared offer variability of land use; good amounts of <br />frontage; potential phasing; water ski potential; reasonable use <br />of flood prone areas and excellent potential fora high dollar <br />development. These sketches are just that -- sketches. Don't <br />hesitate to have us take a different tack if you see another way <br />you want to go. The purpose of our studies to this point is to <br />try to stimulate additional thought and start to reduce the vast <br />number of options available to a manageable level. <br />We are ready to proceed into the next phase of thought whenever you <br />give us the word. <br />Sincerely, <br />_--- - L <br />Richard C1, Phelps, ASGCA <br />RMP/pf <br />~~ ~ <br />