My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP10403
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP10403
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:39:52 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:24:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/19/1981
Doc Name
1981 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS WEST PORTAL AREA
From
ROCKY MOUNTAIN GEOTECHNICAL
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />SUMMARY <br />Project Location: The project is located at the site of the <br />Bear Mine, approximately one-half mile east <br />of Somerset, Colorado, in Gunnison County. <br />Project Description: The project is to consist of the abandonment <br />of the west portal area. The project ~•~i11 <br />consist of the plugging and backfilling of tt-.e existing portal <br />areas above the level of an existing bench fill. <br />Scope of Report: The purpose of this report is to provide the <br />results of an investigation and a computer- <br />assisted limit equilibrium slope stability analysis for <br />several different alternatives available for the abandonment <br />of the west portal area. <br />' Results of Analyses: Mary different alternatives were considered <br />involving various combinations of procedures, <br />I including backfilling only immediately above the portal areas, <br />backfilling to the top of the existing high wall cut, the use <br />of on-site materials for fill, and the importation of fill <br />materials. Further, the analysis involves several different <br />assumptions with respect to shear strength of existing mate- <br />rials. All of the various combinations or conditions considered <br />are discussed in great detail in the body of this report. How- <br />ever, as a very broad, general summary, it would appear that <br />backfilling to just above the level of the portal area, util- <br />izing on-site fill materials from the existing bench fill, <br />I yields acceptable factors of safety against sliding when <br />the shear strength of the foundation and existing cut slope <br />materials exceeds 91 degrees. All other alternatives, includ- <br />ing backfilling to the top of the existing high wall cut, and <br />I any attempt to fill the entire area of the existing bench fill <br />with imported fill materials, will require a loading berm placed <br />at the toe of the existing bench fill. <br />1 Additional discussion and more complete recommendations may be <br />' found in the body of this report. All recommendations are subject <br />to limitations set forth herein. <br />I -1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.