My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP10000
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP10000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:39:29 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:17:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/5/1996
Doc Name
1994 AHR Review Responses
From
ENERGY FUELS COAL INC
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
1994
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />David Berry <br />January 22, 1996 <br />Page 3 <br />By mid 1995, EFCI determined that the plan to breach the ]North seals could not be <br />approved by MSHA. Plans were then made and implemented to drain water within the <br />mine from t North into 2 North, where it would then be pumped into the West Mains <br />as approved in the permit. This system was initiated in August 1995, and use of the <br />North Well ended by the end of August 1995. <br />2) The AHR discusses mine inflow monitoring performed on an opportunistic basis. This <br />monitoring provides monitoring of inflows at least semi-annually. Some inflows occur <br />intermittently or for short durations (refer to AHR Table 2) and may only be <br />monitored one time during the twelve-month period. In addition, retreat mining and <br />sealing operations sometimes eliminate the opportunity to monitor inflows semi- <br />annually. EFCI has revised Table 2 to show monitoring dates, and attached a copy <br />hereto for your records. <br />3) The quantities shown on Table 2 coincide with the 1994 AIIR reporting period of July <br />1994, through June 1995. <br />Recommendation Stipulation <br />1) No response required. <br />2) EFCI agrees that Stipulation No. 6 can be terminated. <br />3) EFCI will provide a minor revision to include the provisions of Stipulation No. 18 by <br />adding specific language to Section 2.05.6 and/or Exhibit 25. <br />4) EFCI agrees that Stipulation No. 15 can be terminated. Stipulation No. 16, according <br />to the permit Findings of Compliance dated June 24, 1994, has been terminated. <br />Additionally, EFCI suggests terminating Stipulation No. 24 (addressed by Technical <br />Revision No. 20). <br />Please contact me at your convenience if you have any questions or require additional <br />information. <br />Sincerely, <br />Allen S. Weaver <br />Mine Engineer <br />enc. <br />cc: G.V. Patterson (EFCI) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.