My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP09581
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP09581
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:39:10 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:10:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/1/1996
Doc Name
1995 AHR
Annual Report Year
1995
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> • The main water source of the mine was changed from the high TDS(>5000 ppm) <br /> alluvial well water to a significantly lower TDS (500 ppm) surface lagoon. <br />' • The raw water tank was thoroughly cleaned and disinfected to remove sludge built <br />up over years. This sludge was found to contain significantly high levels (1000 <br /> colonies/ml) of bacteria. <br />' <br /> • An MSHA waiver was received to stop the use of Wendon Dustrol-10 surfactant <br />' in the water spray at the longwall face. The surfactant has been found to be lethal <br />to fish life at 500 p <br />m <br /> p <br />. <br />The WQCD also sent an effluent sample and prior toxicity reports to the EPA laboratory in Duluth, <br />Minnesota to investigate the cause of toxicity. WFU believes WQCD has not heard from EPA in <br />this regard. <br />' On December 28, 1992, WG1CD wrote to WFU asking either () to develop a control program which <br />' eliminates the toxicity through Vestment of the TDS or (ii) to perform a study which determines <br />'d TDS is having a toxic effect on the sVeam and to develop a level of TDS at the discharge point <br />at which an instream impact is not expected. On March 29, 1993, WFU submitted a plan to use <br />' the Rapid Bioassessment Protocol III per EPA guidelines. Under this plan, WFU would test the <br />extent of impairment, 'rf any, on the aquatic life in the White River due to the mine water discharge. <br />' It will involve sampling and testing of micro-invertebrates. No fish will be collected since the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife refused to grant permission to do so because of the endangered squawfish being <br />planted in the river. WFU has not received WQCD's approval of this plan. <br />The toxicity problem with the mine water was limited to the first longwall district. Mining in this <br />district was completed in early 1993. The disVict has since then been sealed underground. There <br />was pumping of accumulated water from this district and no WET tests were failed during this <br />water year. The second longwall mining district water is pumped through SDH-3 and SDH-5. <br />' No toxicity was indicated during this water year. <br />2.3 Red Wash Alluvial Monltoring Program <br />Portions of Red Wash have experienced subsidence due to longwall mining at the Deserado Mine. <br />' As required by CMLRD, Western Fuels initiated a detailed hydrology monitoring program in Red <br />Wash above the first Iongwall panel to be mined. The monitoring program consists of nine (9) <br />holes drilled in the Red Wash alluvium across the predicted zone of subsidence from longwall <br />panel 1 (LW-1). Water levels in the holes were monitored before, during and after active <br />' 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.