My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP09352
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP09352
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:39:00 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:06:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/22/1982
Doc Name
SOIL TRANSECT SAMPLING FOR RADIONUCLIDES FOR THE ORE SORTER REJECT & MINE WASTE DUMP COTTER CORP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />tdr. Dick Gamewell <br />June 22, 2982 <br />Page - Eight - <br />the then applicable rules and regulations. <br />Water Quality Control Division <br />Comment No. 1 - "Concerning item #1, the sur <br />program appears adequate for the waste dump. <br />sampling program below the ore sorter. As a <br />may require runoff from the waste dump to be <br />to the water treatment plant. WQCD may also <br />Water Quality permit renewal." <br />Face water monitoring <br />You may want a runoi'f <br />point of information MLRB <br />contained and channeled <br />require thi s under tt~e <br />Pesponse to Comment No. 1 - Cotter's NPDES permit number CO-000124, <br />renewed by the Water Quality Control Division on April 22, 1982, requires <br />that a waste dump runoff study be conducted by Cotter. In addition, <br />the draft radioactive materials license requires the collection oi' <br />surface water samples downstream from the ore sorter. <br />Comment No. 2 - "Concerning item #2, groundwater monitoring may be <br />appropriate if there is an indication that the sedimentation ponds are <br />leaking and that they will be used in the future. However, there are <br />three points to be considered. <br />a) The flocculation process would tend to seal the ponds as <br />effectively as bentonite. <br />b) If the ponds do leak, the water quality should not be any <br />different from the current discharge, and the travel time <br />to the stream is short. Thus there would be no long term <br />impacts if the ponds were removed. <br />c) Once the uranium treatment plant is operating, there should <br />be no need for those ponds. <br />Should the ponds continue to be used, monitoring of grourd <br />water is contemplated in the water quality permit." <br />Response to Comment No. 2 - It is anticipated that the radioactive <br />materials license will require the collection of quarterly ground- <br />water samples from the three observations wells on-site. <br />Comment No. 3 - "Flow rates in Ralston Greek should be taken each time <br />a grab sample is taken, at both upstream and downstream sampling sites. <br />This will provide a correlation between concentrations and stream flow, <br />and will provide information on stream loading (lbs/day)." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.