Laserfiche WebLink
., <br />i <br />Original Division question <br />7. The statement in the text was made "actual salt loading ... is less than <br />predicted." What were the actual vs. predicted? Some quantitative <br />comparison data should be included to support this conclusion. <br />CYCC response <br />(Discussion of analysis which supports an original statement) <br />Current Division response <br />The Division accepts this discussion. However, in future reports, this discussion <br />should be included as part of the permit text within the AHR itself. Statements <br />which indicate that "actual salt loading is less than predicted" should be supported <br />with the appropriate data, referenced and analyzed by CYCC, which led to this <br />conclusion. <br />Original Division question <br />8. Bedrock wells 026-94-M001 and 026-94-M002 need the well casing <br />measuring point elevation added to Figure 2. <br />CYCC response <br />Elevations have been added to Figure 2 and will be included in future AHR's. <br />Current Division response <br />Please be aware that the CYCC response to this issue was a future commitment to <br />include the appropriate information in future AHR's. The Division anticipates this <br />information will be included beginning with the 1997 report due in early 1998. <br />Original Division question <br />Monitoring Frequency <br />$prines <br />The following springs were identified as flowing greater than 35 gpm in <br />May of 1993; O, Mine 1, C-1, D, E, M2-87, Q, and R. <br />* no data was provided in 1994 for O, Mine 1, and M2-87. <br />