Laserfiche WebLink
nsultants, Inc. ~^~~~,-t,~ <br />t 4'" 'w°'~ <br />Geotechnical /Environmental Engineering • Materials Tenting _ <br />JUL 1 ~/ 2002 <br />DIYISIOn Of Minerals and Geology <br />July 12, 2002 <br />Twentymile Coal Company <br />29515 RCR #27 <br />Oak Creek, CO 80467 <br />Attn: Mr. Rick Mills <br />Job Number: 99-3983 <br />Subject: Quarterly Observation Report, Refuse Pile, <br />Foidel Creek Mine, Routt County, Colorado. <br />Gentlemen: <br />As requested, NWCC, Inc. (Northwest Colorado Consultants, Inc.) has prepared this letter outlining our <br />observations made during the second quarter of 2002 ai the Refuse Pile, which is located at the Foidel <br />Creek Mine in Routt County, Colorado. During this quarter, we visited the project site on May 6 and June <br />26, 2002 to provide our quarterly observations, as well as to test the compaction of the materials being <br />placed and compacted. <br />A[ the time of our site visit on May 6, 2002, we met with Mr. Rick Mills of Twentymile Coal Company to <br />observe the conditions at the Refuse Pile. At the time of our visit, it appeared that the majority of the refuse <br />materials (waste coal) that were produced during this visit were being stockpiled in [he south end of Area 2, <br />where the overburden clays had been previously removed. At the time of this visit, we also noted that the <br />client was beginning to spread and compact the fill materials in Area I and had already spread out and <br />compacted the refuse materials in the northern portions of Area 2. Based on our observations, it appeared <br />that the east face of the refuse pile below Bench #1 appeared stable. We did not observe any signs of slope <br />failure, seepage or slumping in these areas. In addition, i[ appeared that the vegetation in the previously <br />seeded slopes was starting to come in. <br />At the time of our site visit on June 26, 2002, we conducted ten (10) compaction tests (#210 to #219) across <br />[he portion of the refuse pile in which the compacted lift had been placed in Areas 1 and Area 2. A copy of <br />the compaction test results and daily report are also attached. Based on the compaction test results, i[ <br />appeared that the compaction and moisture content of the fill materials placed in these areas were highly <br />variable. Three failing tests were recorded. Based on our observations and test results, we recommended <br />to Rick Mills and Dave Wallace of Twentymile Coat Company that no additional materials be placed or <br />stockpiled in these areas until the entire exposed fill surface has been scarified, thoroughly mixed and then <br />recompacted. We recommended that our firm retest the failing test areas, as well take additional tests after <br />they have scarified, mixed and recompacted these areas. [t should be noted that the abbreviations given in <br />the Nuclear Density Tes[ Results (Proctor Data) aze as follows: Maximum DD =Maximum Dry Density <br />and OMC =Optimum Moisture Content. Both of these values have been determined in accordance with <br />(970) 879.7888 • Fax (970) 879.7891 • nwcc@cmn.net <br />2580 Copper Ridge Drive • P.O. Box 775226 • Steamboat Springs, CO 80477 <br />