My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP09075
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP09075
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:38:48 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:02:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/28/2006
Doc Name
2005 AHR Review letter
From
DRMS
To
Coors Energy Company
Annual Report Year
2005
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Require- <br /> <br />Requirement Require-ment <br />citation ment <br />complied <br />Comment <br /> with ? <br /> es/no <br /> DRMS previously concluded the Keenesburg Mine does not <br /> have the potential to negatively impact ground water and, <br /> therefore, a ground water point of compliance is not <br /> warranted (Memo to 2004 AHR file, dated 7/6/05). The <br /> memo of 7/6/05 also explains that if coal spoil or ash <br /> leachate migrated from the pit through eolian sand, Ennis i <br /> alluvium, or the Laramie sandstone and coal, attenuation and <br /> dispersion would result in levels of TDS and SAR in ground <br /> water that are near pre-mining conditions within a few <br />R. Basic Standards CWQCC hundred feet of Keenesburg's pit. The mine monitors water <br />for Ground regulations yes quality in the Ennis alluvium and eolian sand in well DH-96, <br />Water 41.4 and 41.5 located approximately 6,000 ft. downgradient from the <br /> mine's pits. Total dissolved solids in DH-96 averaged 1375 <br /> mg/I in 2005, well below a 1750 mg/I background level <br /> identified in the 7/6/05 memo. <br /> Each pit disrupts the potentiometric surface. After final <br />S. Restoration of backfilling, the pits can be expected to show full recovery <br />ground water CDRMS of the potentiomehic surface outside of the pits and water <br />rechazge to regulation yes table (unconfined) conditions inside the pits. No <br />approximate 4.05.11(3) significant formation of surface spoil springs is expected <br />premining rate due to the flat topography; therefore, there will be no loss <br /> of round water flows to surface waters. <br /> The Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of the <br /> permit application predicts no appreciable impacts to <br />T. Prevention of ground water systems outside the permit area. Water <br />adverse impacts CDRMS quality data from well DH-96 indicate there have been no <br />to ground water regulation yes adverse impacts to ground water in the Ennis alluvium and <br />systems outside 4.05.1 I eolian sand outside the permit area, approximately 6,000 ft. <br />the permit area downgradient from the mine's pits. <br /> The approved post-mining land use of most of the permit <br />U. Prevention of area is rangeland (a few acres are approved for <br />impacts to commercial/industrial gas well use). As previously <br />ground water CDRMS discussed, ground water in the Ennis alluvium and eolian <br />that adversely regulations yes sand have not been adversely impacted by mining and <br />impact the 4.05.1(2) and reclamation operations at the Keenesburg Mine. Ground <br />postmining land 4.05.11 water in the Laramie coal and sandstone is not likely to have <br />use within the had adverse impacts as explained in the previous discussion <br />permit area of Basic Standards for Ground Water. ~' <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.