Laserfiche WebLink
Mountain Coal Company 1999 Annual Hydrology Report West Elk Mine <br />• Hydrologic Monitoring Activities <br />Surface Water Monitoring <br />)n WY99, the surface water-monitoring program remained essentially the same as during WY98. <br />No new surface water stations were added during WY99. All surface water stations were <br />monitored as part of the regulaz program since baseline had been established. The locations of all <br />surface water monitoring stations aze shown on Map 2. Field water quality samples were taken <br />three times during the water yeaz at all stations when sufficient flows were present. On an annual <br />basis, all stations were sampled and the samples were analyzed for a full suite of parameters (Table <br />1). <br />Sampling Methods <br />Surface water monitoring was conducted seasonally. Monitoring measurements included flow, field <br />parameters, and laboratory pazameters as identified in Table 1. Surface water flow was measured <br />through Parshall flumes of varying sizes at the continuously recording stations identified in Table 1. <br />Continuous recording is done with Stevens Type F recorders and dataloggers. Temperature, pH, <br />and conductivity were obtained at each surface water sampling station by selecting a grab sample <br />volume from surface water flow and measuring the sample for the parameters using standazd <br />instruments that were calibrated in the field. Samples for analysis of laboratory pazameters were <br />collected by filling a clean pre-fixed sample bottle from non-aerated flow. Sample bottles were <br />• sealed, labeled, placed on ice, and transported to the laboratory for analysis. All equipment was <br />rinsed before and after sampling with distilled water, as well as sample water, prior to measurement <br />of sample parameters. <br />Seeps and Springs Monitoring <br />During WY99, forty-one springs were included in the West Elk Mine monitoring program (Map <br />?). Table 2 lists the springs and groups the springs into four broad categories: (])springs above <br />the F-Seam in the North Fork drainage basin; (2) springs in or below the F-Seam in the North <br />Fork drainage basin: (3) springs and other water resources above the B-Seam in the Jumbo <br />Mountain area in the North Fork drainage basin; and (4) springs above the E-Seam in the Dry <br />Fork drainage. Field water quality samples were taken three times during the water yeaz at all <br />stations that were flowing. On an annual basis, all stations were sampled and the samples were <br />analyzed for a full suite of parameters (Table 2). <br />As part of Technical Revision No. 88, approved in August 1999, seventeen springs were <br />removed from the monitoring program as indicated in Table 2. One new spring (11-2) was <br />added to the monitoring program during WY99. While baseline monitoring was initiated on <br />spring 1 1-2, all other springs were monitored as part of the regular progam. <br />• <br />831-031.510 Pages Wright H'arerEngineers <br />