Laserfiche WebLink
Require- <br />' ment <br /> Require- complied <br />Requirement ment with ? (yes Comment <br /> citation I <br /> no/indeterm <br /> -inate <br />Q. Content of CDMG <br />pond reports regulation yes <br /> 4.05.6 13 <br /> The monitoring plan on permit page 5-36 calls for sampling 3 <br /> wells semiannually for both field parameters and full suite <br />R. Sampling Page 5-36 analysis. One of the three wells (94-1) was backfilled and <br />frequency of of CDMG reclaimed in 2002 during reclamation of the South Pit. The two <br />ground water mining yes remaining wells are located upgradient and downgradient of the <br />monitoring permit C- mine; sampling frequencies in these two wells were met in 2003. <br />wells 92-080 Reclamimed well 94-I was within the mine, and its elimination <br /> will not significantly hinder the identification of trends in <br /> ground water quality and flow. The permit application should <br /> be revised via a TR to reflect the reclamation of we1194-1. <br />S. Para- <br />meters page 5-36 <br />to be of CDMG <br />analyze For the samples collected, all required parameters were <br />d in mining Yes analyzed. <br />ground Permit C- <br /> 92-080 <br />water <br />sam les <br /> Should any degradation occur, the following two aquifers are <br /> the most likely to be degraded by mining at Carbon Junction: the <br /> Animas River alluvium (400 ft. downslope from the mine) and <br /> the Pictured Cliffs Sandstone (subcrops beneath the mine pit). <br /> Alluvial aquifers; Animas River alluvial water can be expected <br /> to have not been degraded by mining because the less than 50- <br /> CWQCC acre surface area of spoil at the mine would not generate enough <br />T. Basic regulation leachate to overcome the dilutional effect of native alluvial <br />Standards ground water. <br />for Ground s <br />41.4 and yes Bedrock aquifers: Downgradient monitoring well 95-1 was <br />Water 41 5 drilled in i/94 to total depth 350 ft. Although its perforated <br /> depths are unavailable, presumably it was perforated like <br /> reclaimed well 94-1 i.e. top to bottom. The presumed perforated <br /> interval of well 95-1 extends through sandstone beds in the <br /> Fruitland formation and the Pictured Cliffs sandstone. The well <br /> is within the expected flowpath of any coal spoil leachate that <br /> would be generated in the Carbon Junction backfilled pits. Well <br /> 95-1 has not shown evidence of leachate. <br />U. Restoration <br />of ground <br />water CDMG Carbon Junction's approximate 100-acre surface disturbance <br />recharge to regulation yes probably is not enough to diminish recharge to aquifers. <br />approximate 4.05.11(3) <br />premining <br />rate <br />Page 3 <br />