Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Govei <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SNELTON, Director <br />DATE: August 14, 1987 <br />T0: Tam Gillis <br />FROM: Steve Renner <br />RE: Munger and McClane Canyon Mines Annual F~ydrologic Report <br />(Files C-80-004, C-81-021) <br />Per your request, I have reviewed the Salt Creek Mining Compagy Annual <br />Iydrologic Report (AHR) for the Munger and McClane Canyon Mines.-~Th1s annual <br />report was submitted to satisfy conditions of the approved permit. <br />The McClane and Munger Mines remained essentially inactive during the <br />reporting period. Therefore, little change to previously reported conditions <br />has occurred. While the Munger Canyon Mine remains dry, the McClane-Canyon <br />Mine realizes inflows of approximately 1.2 gallons per minute. Although there <br />is same question as to the inflow mechanics, the consequences of dewatering <br />into the mine remain negligible. The statement of probable hydrologic <br />consequences regarding ground water impacts remains va11d for both operations. <br />Due to site inactivity, the surface water monitoring program is restricted to <br />quarterly monitoring of McClane Creek and Munger Creek. Water quallly <br />analysis results demonstrate that each creek exhibits variable concentrations <br />of each sampled parameter as flow conditions change. No clearly discernable <br />pattern of parameter concentration is evident. Based upon the McClane Creek <br />water qua111iy sample of January, 1987, it does not appear that the McClane <br />Car(yon Mine discharge is significantly impacting McClane Creek. It appears, <br />therefore, that the statement of probable iydrologic consequences regarding <br />impacts to Salt Creek remains valid for both operations. <br />Although the report is very well done, it is suggested that future annual <br />hydrologic reports be structured around a water year (October 1 through <br />September 30) reporting period. Changing the actual period of time in which <br />data is examined will not imps^t the frequency or timing of data collection, <br />nor will it affect the submit date for the report. Changing to the water <br />year forniat'wiil allow both the Division and f3ie operator to analyze data <br />within a logical period of time :base flow to baseflow. If the operator wishes <br />to discuss the mechanics of changing to this reporting period, please have <br />them contact me. <br />cc: Mike Savage <br />/bdc <br />1777E <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel (3031 888:3587 <br />