My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP08636
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP08636
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:38:28 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 11:56:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1993041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
APPENDIX B MODFLOW COMPUTER MODEL DATA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~.~~ u~ ni~~nw G GG as 1~3 ~-FU mll Z~~j.4f~ ~CD6V" •m Of O <br />of 16 gpm (a recharge rate of 16 gpm equates to <br />approximately 15 inches of water per year over a pond area <br />of 2 acres) to 300 gpm. <br />~oncentual Scenario <br />Assuming a value of 10'5 cm/s for K, and upon review of water budget <br />information, the pond in the reclaimed area should experience an <br />average net loss of about 10 gpm annually (about 2040 cubic feat <br />per day. <br />Since the remainder of the area of the reclaimed pit is much larger <br />than the pond and the fill material will have a relatively high K, <br />the pond will recieve constant recharge for a considerable time. If <br />the net outflow of the system through the pond (acting as a sink) <br />continues to be greater than the net inflow, groundwater levels in <br />the reclaimed area will begin to drop. However, the water levels <br />in the reclaimed pit will not drop below the bottom of the pond and <br />will probably be maintained at some intermediate level (i.e. <br />between the original water table surface and the level of the pond <br />bottom, an assumed range pf about 15 feet). The post reclamation <br />groundwater surface would be such that gradients would become <br />steepest near the northern boundary of the reclaimed mine area <br />while gradients in the central and southern pertions of the pit <br />would flatten. Groundwater levels in the southern portion of the <br />pit may become slightly elevated due to the large contrast in K <br />near the southern reclaimed pit boundary. If the pond acts as a <br />sink, the groundwater system within the majority of the reclaimed <br />area (especially around the pond) may always be somewhat depressed <br />when compared to the regional flow system. <br />Numerical $imulation <br />In order to lend support to the conceptual modeling analysis, a <br />highly preliminary generalized numerical simulation was conducted <br />using the 3-dimensional model MoDFLOW (Mcdonald fi Harbaugh (1984). <br />The model consists of a variable-spaced one layer grid with 29 rows <br />and 17 columns. A copy of the model grid is included as attachment <br />2. The cells of the northern grid boundary were set as constant <br />heads while all other cells were set as active. The reclaimed area <br />was treated as an unconfined aquifer with a variably saturated <br />thickness of about 100 feet. The preliminary steady state numerical <br />simulation assumes that the K of the bedrock material immediately <br />surrounding the reclaimed pit is equal to .03 ft/d (10'5 cm/s). <br />The pond area which was incorporated into the simulation is located <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.