Laserfiche WebLink
The increase in total vegetation cover is directly related to the increased precipitation <br />prior to the growing season. The magnitude of the general increase in total vegetation <br />cover is dominated by two species of the community (Bromus inermis and Conwlwlus <br />arvensis), and individual increases or decreases in total (and relative) cover or are more <br />than offset by the 250 percent increase in the number of species providing cover in the <br />1997 sampling. Increases in species numbers also appear directly related to increased <br />precipitation (Savage and Savage, 1995, 1995a, 1995b) in both reclaimed and native <br />vegetation communities. <br />Total herbaceous production also showed an increase from 1996 to 1997. Total <br />herbaceous production rose from 127.71 g/mz in 1996 to 184.94 g/m2 in 1997. This <br />44.8 percent rise appears related to increased precipitation prior to the growing season <br />in 1997. Notably, plants appeared to reach anthesis and achieve maximum biomass <br />more rapidly in 1997 than in 1996. Sampling in 1996 took place in early August, at <br />which time the majority of plant species had achieved anthesis and maximum biomass. <br />In 1997, the majority of plant species had achieved the same level of development by <br />mid-June. This indicates the degree to which the cool season plant community is <br />attuned to precipitation in this environment. <br />As indicated above, plant species numbers increased in cover sampling from six in <br />1996 to fifteen in 1997. The greatest increase in new species numbers occurred in the <br />forb lifeform (two in 1996, nine in 1997). As with cover and herbaceous production, <br />species numbers appeaz directly correlated to precipitation amount. <br />COMPARATIVE VEGETATION COMMUNITY SAMPLING AT THE WEST <br />ELK MINE <br />As discussed by Savage and Savage (1996), the historic record vegetation community <br />was found to closely resemble the dry meadow herbaceous vegetation community <br />within the permit area of the West Elk Mine. The dry meadow community was <br />sampled in 1982 and the dry meadow reference area was sampled in 1982 and 1995 <br />(Mountain Coal Company, 1997, Savage and Savage, 1995). While the dry meadow <br />community (either affected area or reference area) is no longer being quantitatively <br />sampled, it is productive to compare observations made at the historic record vegetation <br />community to those from the dry meadow community within Sylvester Gulch. Tables <br />7 and 8 provide comparisons of the sampled parameters for the dry meadow <br />community, dry meadow reference area, and the historic record vegetation community <br />from the years 1982 through 1997. Figure 4 provides a graphic representation of the <br />parameters as they relate to "pre-growing season" precipitation amounts. <br />Relative cover in the dry meadow affected area, dry meadow reference area, and <br />historic record vegetation community during the sample years 1982, 1995, 1996 and <br />1997 illustrates dominance by one cool season grass species in each of the <br />communities. In the 1982 dry meadow community, the species was .~gropyron smithii. <br />In the dry meadow reference area and the historic record vegetation community, the <br />-Ia <br />