My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1984-05-03_REPORT - M1978352
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1978352
>
1984-05-03_REPORT - M1978352
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 2:42:24 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 11:49:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978352
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/3/1984
Doc Name
NOTTINGHAM S&G PN 78-352 EAGLE PIT
From
MLRD
To
PETRE & ZIMMERMAN
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL FEE / REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mrs. Courtney G. Petre -3- May 3, 1984 <br /> 6. Enclosed is a copy of the comments from the State Engineer - Water <br /> Resources Division. The Division recommends that all mine operators <br /> check compliance of their operation(s) with State Water Law. If <br /> mining commences without prior compliance with applicable State <br /> Water Laws, the State Engineer may take enforcement action. <br /> IV. Exhibit E - Reclamation Plan <br /> 1 . The reclamation plan as proposed in this amendment appears to limit, <br /> delete and qualify portions of the existing plan which was developed <br /> by the Land Design Partnership. The existing reclamation plan as <br /> was approved as a technical revision will stand unless the applicant <br /> provides sufficient justification to the Division' s satisfaction <br /> that specific changes will enhance the possibility of achieving <br /> reclamation success. <br /> 2. The Division is concerned about the final topography as it relates <br /> to drainages which cross the permit area. These points of inflow <br /> into the permit area should be shown on one of the application <br /> maps. Furthermore, the applicant should show what measures will be <br /> instituted to prevent erosion at these spots after revegetation has <br /> taken place. <br /> 3. The amount and type of fertilizer will need to be determined at the <br /> time of topsoil reapplication. For both on-site and imported soils <br /> the following analyses will be needed: nitrogen, potassium and <br /> phosphate as P05. <br /> V. Exhibit L - Reclamation Costs <br /> 1 . The operator has proposed that there will be no phased reclamation <br /> and no reclamation be instituted until all mining has been completed <br /> in the western portion of the permit area. The bond and amount must <br /> be recalculated to include the total cost for reclamation of the <br /> site. <br /> The amount of financial warranty is based on the estimated cost to <br /> the Division should the permittee abandon the site and outside <br /> contractors were hired by the Division to complete the reclamation <br /> plan. It is the Division' s opinion that the reclamation costs as <br /> estimated by Nottingham Sand and Gravel in Exhibit L are <br /> insufficient. <br /> 2. The reclamation cost calculation must include the cost for <br /> importation of topsoil and for importation of fill to level the <br /> settling pond. The volume of the settling pond must be provided to <br /> confirm the bonding cost. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Carol Russell <br /> Reclamation Specialist <br /> CR/ep <br /> Doc. No. 1212 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.