Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Marcus Middleton - 3 - May 18, 1992 <br />Water Quality Analysts <br />Bedrock Wells <br />1. All requirements were met. <br />Alluvial Wells <br />1. 009-5-10, 008-AV-2, 006-AW-2, 006-AY-1, 006-AZ-3 ali are missing a <br />Pb analysis on 6/23/91. Also silver is included but apparently not <br />required. <br />Spoil Wells <br />1. All Requirements were met. <br />Surface Water <br />i. All Requirements were met. <br />Springs <br />1. All requirements were met. <br />Ponds <br />1. A11 requirements were met (see monitoring frequency section). <br />Conclusion <br />At the time of this review responses to questions raised in the 1990 AHR <br />review have not been received by the Division. However, no evidence of <br />escalating trends are apparent in the 1991 data. Foidel Creek, Fish Creek, <br />Middle Creek, and Trout Creek all show conductivity values very similar to the <br />previous year's values. No evidence of downstream degradation due to salt <br />loading is apparent to-date. No heavy metal contamination is evident. Water <br />quantity measurements show the expected seascnal trends and no increase or <br />decrease in flow volumes is apparent. As mentioned, please include an <br />historic precipitation graph in all future AHR's. <br />We look forward to your response to these issues. Thank you for your <br />continued efforts to comply with your water monitoring program. <br />Sincerely, <br />r ~n,~~-- <br />l <br />Kent A. Gorham <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />KAG/yjb <br />3136E <br />