Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br />~ r <br />the table should reflect the quarterly frequency consistent with the permit. Likewise, the stated <br />requirement to submit the water quality results to DMR doesn't seem necessary, given that those <br />results haven't told us much in the past. Presentation of the results in the AHR should be <br />sufficient. <br />6. Dan, add your comment regazding wells 2-17L and 2-17M. I remember that this issue <br />confused me when [first reviewed [he monitoring data for the midterm review some months ago. <br />7. Amine inflow survey should be accomplished annually and reported in the AHR. Mine <br />inflow is described in the PHC section of the permit and it is difficult to compaze hydrology in a <br />given yeaz if all we have is 1994 data. The flows reported for 1994 aze well within the range <br />anticipated in the PHC, but these should be summazized at least annually. <br />