My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP07597
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP07597
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:37:44 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 11:40:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/28/1997
Doc Name
1996 AHR & CORRESPONDENCE
From
MULTIPLE PARTIES
Annual Report Year
1996
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />°• <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone. (303) 866-3567 <br />fAX: (3031 832-8106 <br />DATE: April 23, 1997 <br />TO: Jim Burnell /~ <br />FROM: Dan Mathews (Y <br />RE: Deserado 1996 <br />File C-81-018 <br />~~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Ramer <br />Governor <br />lames 5. Lochhrad <br />Ezeculrvp Director <br />Michael B. Long <br />Dimsion Director <br />I have completed a preliminary review of the Deserado 1996 AHR <br />(which covers water year October, 1995 through September, 1996). <br />A copy of that report, along with an updated "Deserado AHR <br />Information" packet should have been delivered to you last week. <br />Check with Larry, or let me know if you haven't received it. With <br />the exception of items noted below, the report appears to comply <br />with applicable permit and regulatory requirements. <br />I am requesting your evaluation of the data and analyses included <br />in the report, with respect to apparent conformance with PHC <br />projections. I also have a few questions for your consideration <br />(see below). <br />Good luck Jim, should you elect to accept this mission. <br />1995 Unresolved Issues <br />There were two outstanding issues remaining from the Division's <br />9/17/96 AHR review letter. <br />1) As noted in the updated AHR Information packet, the issue <br />concerning the status of certain effluent sample and toxicity <br />reports which had been sent to EPA in 1992 appears to have been <br />adequately addressed by the 1996 AHR text and Appendix H. <br />2) The question regarding whether or not the operator should be <br />required to monitor and report field parameters for mine inflows <br />needs to be resolved. The application text describing AHR data <br />collection and reporting indicates that this monitoring would be <br />done, but it is not specified in the ground water or surface water <br />monitoring sections of the application, and the data has apparently <br />not been collected in the past. <br />If the data is necessary for PHC verification purposes, the <br />monitoring plan will need to be revised as necessary. If not, the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.