Laserfiche WebLink
• have been collected at these sites. However, none of these values fell outside the typical historical range of other <br />wells in this aquifer. <br />,~ / <br />Fish Creek Sandstone: During 2000, two Fish Creek Sandstone wells (91M001 and 91M004) required <br />monitoring for water levels on a quanerly basis. Monitoring requirements were met during the 2000 Water Year <br />at these wells. An additional well (Ashley required semi-annual monitoring for water levels and field <br />parameters,-and annual water qua`~ty sampling. Tables 21, 22, and 23 provide summaries of the 2000 Water Year <br />data collected at each site. Figure 40 provides graphical representation of the period of record water levels <br />measured a[ sites 91M001 and 91M004. The seasonal fluctuation apparent in well 91M001 in prior years seems <br />to have stabilized in 2000. Water levels at the Ashley well (Figure 41) dropped appreciably after subsidence, but <br />are continuing to recover in 2000. Field measurements and water quality parameters for the Ashley well are <br />provided on Table 23. This well established many new maximum and minimum values for tested parameters in <br />2000, due to the limited period for which values have been collected. However, none of these values are <br />anomalous relative to the typical historical range of sandstone aquifers in this area. <br />ALLUVIAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br />Alluvial deposits containing groundwater are monitored in the Foidel Creek, Fish Creek, Trout Creek and Middle <br />Creek drainages. In the Foidel Creek drainage, sites both upstream and downsVeam of the TCC portals and <br />• support facilities are monitored. In the Fish Creek Drainage, sites upstream and downstream of the Mine 2 area <br />and the Fish Creek Borehole mine dewatering facilities are monitored. <br />Foidel Creek Alluvial Groundwater: During 2000, five Foidel Creek alluvial wells, 009-5-10, 001-5-5, 008-AV- <br />2, FO-l, and FO-4, required monitoring for water levels'and field parameters on a monthly basis, and water <br />quality sampling on a quanerl~asis. An additional well, 008-A V-I er quired monthly monitoring for only water <br />levels and field parameters. All monitoring requirements were met at these sites. Tables 24 through 29 provide <br />summaries of [he 2000 Water Year data collected at each site. Tables 24a through 29a provide period of record <br />statistical summaries of collected data at each site. Figures 43 through 55 provide graphical representations of <br />water levels and selected water quality parameters recorded at each site. <br />Water levels during 2000 remained generally consistent with established ranges and patterns and showed the <br />typical seasonal variability of elevated water levels in the spring. Well 009-S-]0 provides data far the alluvial <br />aquifer upgradient from [he mine portals. Well 001-5-5 is located just downgradient form the mine portals and <br />surface facilities location and is monitored in conjunction with surface water monitoring site 8. Figure 47 is <br />indicative of the general relationship between the alluvial groundwater elevations and surface water elevations at <br />these two sites. Wells 008-AV-] and 008-AV-2 are monitored in conjunction with surface water site 304 at a <br />point on Foidel Creek approximately ]000 feet upstream of the confluence of Foidel and Middle Creeks. Water <br />levels in these wells and the stream show the typical seasonal interrelationship of relatively rapid increases and <br />declines associated with spring runoff (Figure 48). The longer-term trends in water levels at these sites generally <br />parallel the fluctuations observed in annual stream Flows. Wells FO-1 and FO-4 are situated on Foidel Creek <br />5 <br />