Laserfiche WebLink
Permit C-81-071 1996 Annual Hydrology Report <br />• with measured data. At all sites, the inverse relationship between flow and field conductivity <br />was evident. <br />Water quality parameter values noted to occur outside of previously established ranges include <br />the following. New maximum calcium, magnesium, and hardness values were established at <br />site 302 in September (Table 27). New maximum total recoverable iron and mercury values <br />were established at site 1002 in April and June respectively (Table 25). No new maximum or <br />minimum values were noted to occur at site 16 (Table 24). <br />The dissolved solids concentrations in the upstream station of Fish Creek (16) are generally <br />slightly lower than those in the downstream station (1002). There is also a slight downstream <br />trend of increasing sodium and sulfate concentrations while calcium, magnesium and <br />bicarbonate concentrations remain fairly consistent. The proportionally higher sodium <br />concentrations over calcium and magnesium leads to a slight downstream increase in SAR. <br />These major ion changes are more apparent during the low-flow period. The increase in TDS <br />could be caused to some extent by evapotransporative effects, but this would not account for <br />the major ion changes. These changes are more likely attributable to discharges of waters <br />having higher sodium and sulfate concentrations than the Fish Creek water. One source of <br />such discharge is the spoil runoff and springs associated with Mine 2. However, the very low <br />flows associated with the Mine 2 disturbed areas indicates minimal influence from this source. <br />The primary source of such water used to be the Foidel Creek mine underground mine <br />discharge point located near Mine 2. During 1996 however, flows from this site were <br />insignificant and ceased in February of the water year. <br />Trout Creek: Two surface flow monitoring sites on Trout Creek are utilized. Site 301 is located <br />• on Trout Creek above the confluence with Middle Creek and site 69 is located on Trout Creek <br />below the confluence. Required monitoring for these sites included monthly flew, field <br />parameter, and water quality sampling during the irrigation season June through September. <br />Site visitation and water quality sampling requirements were met at these sites during 1996. <br />Tables 28 and 29 provide summaries of the 1996 Water Year data collected at Trout Creek <br />surface flow sites. Tables 28a and 29a provide period of record statistical summaries of <br />collected data at sites 301 and 69. Period of record flow summaries for these sites are <br />provided as Tables 28b and 29b. Figures 56 through 63 provide graphical representations of <br />water levels and selected water quality parameters recorded at each site. For the most part, <br />typical patterns were observed although flow magnitudes were higher than those experienced <br />over the past few years. Again, peak flow estimates were derived from extrapolated flow <br />curves in some instances. The single identified water quality variance includes a new maximum <br />pH recorded at site 69 in August. <br />Since 1987, except for a short period during 1990, the salt content of Trout Creek below Middle <br />Creek has been consistently higher than above Middle Creek. Typically, there is approximately <br />100 to 200 umhos/cm increase in field conductivity over this reach. The downstream increase <br />was apparent during the spring runoff period. The Trout Creek salt content increases during <br />the spring runoff. This is probably due to the effects of Middle Creek flows that have a higher <br />salt content than Trout Creek primarily as a result of Foidel Creek which flows into Middle <br />Creek just upgradient of the Trout Creek confluence. Foidel Creek salt loads during the spring <br />runoff are primarily due to the impact of surface mine discharges. However, the Trout Creek <br />salt content increase has not caused material damage, nor is there any increase in trace metal <br />. levels <br />I \DOCUMENTAHRIECKMAN\EP96TE%T.DOC 03/26/97 Page 8 <br />