Laserfiche WebLink
October 29, 1992 <br />Pepe 9 <br />DOMG Concern <br />5) Site 109 raw data shows no discharge information, yet samples <br />were taken. <br />TCC Response <br />Please refer to Monitoring Frequency question #10 response. <br />DOMG Concern <br />6) Site 84 had only three visits in February. <br />TCC Response <br />The fourth February sample was actually collected March 1 as <br />reported in the AHR as previously discussed with CDOH. This was <br />done as the result of a lost sample collected 2/28. The field <br />parameters associated with the lost sample were virtually identical <br />to those of the make-up sample collected March 1. <br />DOMG Concern - Springs <br />1) Spring 20-14 should have two visits rather than one. <br />TCC Response <br />Spring 20-14 was visited two times as required, on 5/20 and 9/30. <br />There was no discharge during either visit. <br />DOMG Concern - Water Oualitv Analysis <br />Bedrock Wells <br />1) 001-83-107 had no level taken on 9/30/91. <br />TCC Response <br />The level reading was taken in psi, and failed to make the transfer <br />during report generation. The values were: psi = 2 elevation = <br />6891.2. <br />