My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP06692
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP06692
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:37:06 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 11:25:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/29/2002
Doc Name
2001 Annual Reclamation Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2001 Soil Sampling: Seneca Mine, Hayden Colorado <br />• <br />Rock Fragments- Rock fragments average 5 percent and ranges 0 to 10 <br />percent. Rock Fragments are predominantly gravel size (2mm to 75mm) of <br />sedimentary origin, primarily sandstone. <br />Structure- The upper horizon in both sample pits are moderate coarse and <br />very coarse platy and sub-angular blocky. The resultant structure and depth <br />of the structure is consistent with a mechanically disked layer but is <br />moderately compacted. The lower topsoil horizon is strong coarse and very <br />coarse sub-angular and angular blocky structure. This indicates moderate <br />compaction. Vegetation analysis discussed below did not indicate that such <br />structure is presenting a problem to plant growth. <br />Consistence- The dry consistence of the upper topsoi! layer is hard.. Moist <br />consistence is friable. Consistence of the lower topsoil horizons is higher than <br />typical for textures of loam. Dry consistence is very hard. Dry consistence <br />indicates moderate compaction through the use of mechanical equipment for ; <br />soil redistribution. Moist consistence is friable to firm. Vegetation analysis. . <br />discussed below did not indicate that• such consistence is presenting a , . <br />problem to plant growth. <br />• Lab Data- Lab data is located in Appendix II. Both the upper and lower topsoil <br />horizons, differing only in their mechanical treatment, have the same chemical <br />properties, pH ranges 6.3 to 7.0 and averages 6.8 which is neutral. Organic <br />matter averages 4.5 percent and ranges 3.5 to 8.6. These results and a!I <br />other lab data indicates topsoil in all sample pits is suitable (Appendix III, <br />Table-2). <br />Subsoil- The same sample pits were sampled for subsoiUspoil from the bottom of <br />the topsoil horizon to the top of spoil material. Field descriptions are located in <br />Appendix IV and lab data is located in Appendix II. All subsoil in all sample pits <br />classify as suitable subsoil (Appendix III, Table-2). SEN-1-99 is a dryland grass/forb <br />site and SEN-2-99 is a shrubland site. Both sites are in their second year of growth. <br />The results follow: <br />Depth- The average depth to the start of subsoil is 10.7 inches (0.9 feet} <br />below the surtace. Depth to subsoil ranges 7 to 19 inches (.6 to 1.5 feet). <br />Sample site S2-01-3 occurs over bedrock at a depth of 24 inches indicating <br />that this site only had surface disturbance. <br />Textures- Textures are looms, clay looms and clays. Clay content averages <br />28 percent and ranges 15 to 44 percent, sand content averages 39 percent <br />• and ranges 18 to 44 percent. Silt content averages 33 percent and ranges 30 <br />to 36 percent. <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />11/09/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.