My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP06382
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP06382
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:36:54 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 11:20:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/28/2003
Doc Name
2002 Annual Hydrology Letter & Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2002
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- Wolf Creek Overburden/Wadge Underburden. Three wells are used to <br />monitor this stratum. Well 7 is located below the Wolf Creek pit. It <br />displays an increasing TDS trend, although recently it has stabilized. <br />Well 8P1 is located below a reclaimed portion of the Wadge pit in the <br />southwest corner of the permit area. The TDS values for this well has <br />stabilized. Well 11 is located just west of the PeaCoCo Pond, below a <br />reclaimed portion of the Wadge pit. It displays a decreasing TDS trend. <br />- Trout Creek Sandstone. Well 5 is used as the potable water supply for <br />the Seneca II Mine. It displays a stable TDS trend. <br />- Spoils. Three wells monitor the spoils above NPDES 002. Well 25, the <br />upper well, does not display a distinct TDS trend. There was not enough <br />water in this well to sample since May 1997. Well 26, the middle well, <br />displayed an increasing TDS trend until 1990/1991, but has decreased <br />since then. Well 27, the bottom well, displays an increasing TDS trend. <br />Well 61 is located in the southwest portion of the permit area. It <br />displays a stable TDS trend. Well 62 is located above NPDES 004. It <br />also displays a stable TDS trend. <br />Comparison of Ground Water Quality to Water Use Standards. SCC has <br />compiled a list of ground water standards for agricultural uses (Table <br />5). This list is composed of Colorado Department of Health ground water <br />standards (CDOH, Aeg. 41, March 19991. <br />Table 6 provides a comparison of ground water quality data this year to <br />agricultural standards. This Paradox database generated table does not <br />include the units of concentration (mg/1 or ug/1) for each parameter. <br />The units used for each parameter are the same as those listed on the <br />standards table (Table 5) and are also the same as those used in the <br />water quality reports. The frequency column on Table 6 indicates the <br />number of exceedences out of the total number of samples (i.e., 1/2 <br />indicates one exceedence out of two samples) . Below is a summary of <br />standards that were exceeded. Given in parenthesis is the source and <br />use of each standard. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.