Laserfiche WebLink
Block 6 <br />The erosion condition composite SSF score for this site was 10, which placed it in the <br />Stable erosion class. The tabulated results for this survey are shown in Table 7. In 2002 gullies <br />on the north facing slope were repaired. Some gullies that were not repaired on the north facing <br />slope have grown in size. No corrective measures are planned as a result of the inventory. <br />Table 7: Moffat Area Block 6 Erosion Condition Classification <br /> Possible <br />Item Score 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 <br />Soil Movement 14 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 3 <br />Surface Litter 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 <br />Surface Rock Fragments 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 <br />Pedestalling 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Flow Patterns I S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 <br />Rills 14 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 6 <br />Gullies IS S 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 8 <br />Total 100 10 11 11 11 11 9 9 15 24 <br />Erosion Condition Classification: Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Slight <br />Block 7 <br />The erosion condition composite SSF score for this site was 6, which placed it in the <br />Stable erosion class. The tabulated results for this survey are shown in Table 8. The lower <br />portion of this block contains some minor rilling. No corrective measures are planned as a result <br />of the inventory. <br />Table 8: Moffat Area Block 7 Erosion Condition Classification <br /> Possible <br />Item Score 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 <br />Soil Movement 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 <br />Surface Litter 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 <br />Surface Rock Fragments 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 <br />Pedestalling 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Flow Patterns ] 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 <br />Rills 14 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 8 3 <br />Gullies IS 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 6 <br />Tota] 100 6 6 6 6 9 9 9 24 20 <br />Erosion Condition Classification: Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable Slight Stable <br />7 <br />