My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP06111
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP06111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:36:44 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 11:15:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/29/2002
Doc Name
2001 Revegetation Monitoring Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L J <br />I~ <br />L J <br />acre. They of course do not account for the shrubs present in high intensity special <br />shrub planting areas. <br />Species Diversity and Composition <br />The 1995 and 1997 reclaimed areas are dominated by native perennial cool season <br />grasses, comprising 40 to 50 percent of total vegetation cover (Figure 5). Native <br />perennial forbs along with the two seeded introduced forbs, alfalfa and cicer milkvetch <br />comprise 20 to 30 percent of the vegetation cover. The lingering annual/biennial <br />component is primarily Pocilla biloba, an introduced species that comes out of the <br />topsoil. It shows up in native areas in abundance only in certain springs, but apparently <br />maintains a presence in the topsoil as ungerminated seed for at least several years. It <br />apparently finds conditions in the maturing reclamation to its liking much longer than <br />most introduced annual/biennial species. Were the sagebrush or mountain brush native <br />areas suddenly to lose their dominant woody plant cover, it is strongly suspected that <br />their lifeform composition would rapidly adjust to proportions similar to these of the <br />maturing reclaimed lands. <br />The distribution of species density by lifeform (Figure 4) shows that the reclaimed areas <br />(especially the maturing 1995 and 1997 areas) are much more similar to the reference <br />areas that would appear to be the case from the lifeform distribution of relative cover <br />(Figure 5). What this shows is that the basic components of the original ecosystem are <br />indeed returned and is a matter of relative proportions that separates the reclaimed from <br />the native vegetation. Perhaps the largest difference with regard to species density is in <br />the native perennial forbs category, where native areas tend to have somewhat more <br />than twice the number of species (of native perennial forbs) per 100 sq.m.. <br />The presence of introduced native perennial cool season grasses, while not an imminent <br />threat to stand integrity, is a menacing potential problem. In particular, the presence of <br />intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermediumj and smooth brome (Bromopsis <br />inermis), neither of which is planted is, as has been demonstrated on this site before, a <br />long-term threat. It is suggested that each year, the particular lots of western <br />wheatgrass and mountain brome (Ceratochloa marginata) a seller proposes to provide <br />be sampled and submitted to a independent seed laboratory for determination of the <br />presence of intermediate wheatgrass and smooth brome, respectively. If present, those <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.