Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />approximately 3 ft. Joint surfaces are typically tight and appear fresh to slightly weathered. <br />' Joints are typically discontinuous. <br />Three dominant secondary joint sets were mapped on Benches B, C, and D and are provided <br />' in Table 1. Two of these joint sets dip steeply to near vertical and strike orthogonal to each <br />other, dipping into and out of the mining face. Vertical presplit blasting holes combined with <br />preferential fracture propagation along these joints, cause the final highwalls to be relatively <br />' vertical. The other secondary joint set strikes north/south and typically dips 35° to 60° to the <br />east. Spacing of joints in the secondary joint sets typically range from 0.5 ft to 10 feet. Joint <br />surfaces are typically tight and appear fresh to slightly weathered. Joints are both continuous <br />' and discontinuous. <br />The following subsections describe particular characteristics and slope conditions of specific <br />' regions of the quarry. <br />A. East Side <br /> The overall slope appears stable. There are localized areas of instability on individual <br /> benches. These typically occur where the primary joint set strikes parallel with the slope and <br /> daylights out of the highwalls, and where secondary joint set(s) occur and serve as <br />' detachment planes. Localized wedge and slab slip surfaces were observed on the outside <br /> edges of individual benches. These slip surfaces are infrequent and are relatively small, <br /> generally less than 10 feet in length. These features are as expected for the highwall and only <br /> cause localized operational inconveniences. Although most are small, one slip surface <br /> approximately 40 feet long and 80 feet wide was noted at locations K and L (Figure 1), <br /> resulting in the loss of most of the bench, but appears to be limited to that bench. This area <br />' will be under water once reclaimed. <br /> Two random (tertiary) joints were identified on the east side (Figure 1, locations G, N). <br />' These random joints are continuous and are orientated sub-perpendicular to the slope and <br /> dipping out of the slope. These random joints coincide with foliation in the rock mass and <br /> are visible for 200 ft in length along the highwall. These joints showed no apparent <br />' movement during blasting of lower benches. <br /> The condition of the rock mass in the vicinity of Benches C and D on the east side is <br />' "competent". In general, the competency of the rock mass at the lower benches is better than <br />at the upper benches. This is the result of a lesser degree of weathering, especially along the <br /> primary joints, and the presence of the iron-rich rock. The iron-rich rock has a jointing <br /> pattern different from the gneiss, and tends to terminate the unfavorable jointing in the gneiss. <br />' Based on the rock mass conditions observed, the condition of the rock mass of the new final <br /> highwalls developed during 2000 was observed to be better than the conditions used as the <br />t baseline (as defined in the Observational Method) for analyses of the east side. <br /> Twenty-six surface surrey points (numbered 2001 through 2026) were established to monitor <br />' the effectiveness of the repair of the unstable slope on $ench 6 and 7. Positions of the <br />surface survey points have been determined by surveys conducted in March and May 1997, <br /> March 1998, August 1998, August 1999 and August 2000, which provide data to assess the <br /> performance of the slide repair during 1998. Several survey points have been damaged by <br />mining activities. All the remaining points exhibited 0.14 ft or less of displacement from <br /> <br />' G ~PROIECTSVO?00 Mormm~ Quarry~008~?(IOOtr<pon0000 geoiechmcal aJdendum doc <br />