Laserfiche WebLink
ICI <br />September 26, 1996 <br />CORE LABORATORIES <br />Sample Delivery Group Narrative <br />Customer: Battle Mountain Resources, Inc. <br />Project: Environmental Samples <br />Core Laboratories Project Number: 962393 <br />During the analysis and subsequent data review, it was noted that a concentration of 0.15398 mg/ <br />L of iron was detected in the digestion blank for sample 962393-001 (960828BMG01). When the <br />sample was analyzed for iron, concenvations greater than 20 times the contamination in the <br />method blank were found. Because the iron contamination was so faz below the iron level in the <br />sample this data was accepted and reported. <br />It was also noted that the method duplicate for sample 962393-002 (960828BMG03) for iron was <br />outside of the normal acceptance limits for method duplicates. Upon review of the data, no defin- <br />itive answer was found to explain the variance. Under a normal CLP reporting format, this iron <br />value and all associated iron values would be flagged with an "'" on the final report. <br /> <br />Linda L. Benkers <br />QA/QC Coordinator <br />T~ N~~I rslu. Mai v mq~uim, rmu+~ n Im rm, u, W,E iaa nivmnP N mu~W rNrl0. N ern b <br />Timothy L. Kellogg <br />Laboratory Supervisor <br />m lf~~Vn N,~nvJ T~~~ ida~m/vev m~p,u~w <br />w~ ~o~ o. e.. uc~.n n co. iconor co. umnow m..... ~ ~....mr o ~v.n..~ .m..> •~a+.a. a.. m.. w.mnv. nwn. r+~. ie w wo.«.+r vm. wnuo. s o~n.,.e, a <br />~r a. w. w s w....~.n om.n .a o w n ~im..n.iw.~. ~ e ~..o o r.o m~ ~>.. ~..s.i.~.. nw,sm w m u ~mm...m. a. o.i..~on ~ro ~n.~ mo... n w. ~no~ <br />