Laserfiche WebLink
~- -.- <br />Treatment 4 (60# N/a with mulch), and Treatment 6 (120# N/a with mulch). <br />The density values for seeded species for each of these treatments were <br />66, 87, and 79 plants per m2, respectively. Cover values for seeded <br />species ranged from 6 percent on the absolute control to 25 percent for <br />Treatment 3 (60# NJa). <br />All treatments show cover values significantly higher than the <br />~~ absolute control (P<.05). No significant differences, however, were seen <br />among treatments when measuring density of seeded species. Height values <br />for the seeded plants for all treatments were significantly higher <br />~ (P<,05) than the absolute control. Treatment 5 (120# N/a}, Treatment 4, <br />and Treatment 6 supported plants that were significantly taller (P<.05) <br /> than other treatments for the height of grasses. The seeded grass species <br /> showing the best growth response are given below. <br />Average Density <br />Common Name (plants per mz) <br />Regar meadow brome 11.5 <br />Poloma Indian ricegrass 8.3 <br />Critana thickspike wheatgrass 7.2 <br />Sawki Russian wildrye 7.7 <br />Sideoats grams 7.7 <br /> <br /> The seeded forbs did not demonstrate the rapid increase in height <br />N obsarved in the grasses. Three of the seeded forbs showed excellent con- <br /> tinued growth fo llowing the second growing season. <br /> <br /> Average Density <br /> Common Name (plants per mz) <br /> Lewis flax 6.1 <br /> Lutana <br />Palmer titer milkvetch <br />penstemon 1.1 <br />1 <br />0 <br /> . <br /> <br /> <br />