My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP04318
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP04318
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:35:28 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:45:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/20/2004
Doc Name
2003 Annual Hydrology Report to Appendix B
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2003
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LJ <br />There were eight chromium values that had elevated detection limits <br />higher than the acute and chronic standards. The cause of these <br />elevated detection limits was a decision by the laboratory to dilute the <br />samples prior to analyses in order to reduce the effects of <br />interferences (primarily, high salinity). Finally, all mercury values <br />reported were less than the most sensitive available detection limit, <br />0.2 ug/1. The standard for mercury is 0.01 ug/1. <br />Surface Water Summary. Water discharged from the Seneca II Mine is not <br />used directly for irrigation. Indirectly, although, water discharged <br />from the mine is significantly diluted by water from either Fish Creek <br />or the Yampa River before it is diverted and used for irrigation. No <br />irrigation exists on Grassy Creek below Seneca II. Due to the relative <br />amount of dilution by additional water from both sources, the ambient <br />water qualities of Fish Creek and the Yampa River are the dominant <br />factors in determining their suitability for irrigation. Water <br />discharged from the Seneca II Mine is, however, used for livestock <br />watering. <br />Below average rainfall and snowfall values resulted in below average <br />discharge values this year. TDS values at NPDES 002 and 003 are <br />increasing at a moderate rate while TDS values at NPDES 004 and 008 are <br />increasing slightly. On lower Grassy Creek (SSG2), TDS values are <br />increasing slightly. Of the nine spoil springs monitored, six are <br />exhibiting decreasing EC trends, while one displays a stable EC trend. <br />Discharges are normally suitable for livestock, but sometimes exceed <br />water quality standards for irrigation and aquatic life. <br />No exceedences of NPDES effluent criteria (Permit No. CO-0000221) <br />occurred this year. <br />American Public Health Association (Ed.). 1985. "Standard Methods for <br />the Examination of Water and Wastewater", 16th Edition, Washington, <br />D.C. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.