Laserfiche WebLink
<br />October 29, 1992 <br />Pege 2 <br />DOMG Concern <br />These items were noted during the 1991 AHR review: <br />a) 2 pages were left out of Table 1 (received by fax). Please <br />submit copies of these pages for inclusion into the 1991 AHR <br />CYCC Response <br />Hard copies of these pages were mailed to the Division immediately <br />O after being sent by FAX. Should the Division require additional <br />pages, please contact us at your convenience. <br />DOMG Concern <br />b) Figure 22, 25, and 52 are labelled as 1990 Water Year. Please <br />correct and submit these pages. <br />CYCC Response <br />The revised pages are enclosed. <br />DOMG Concern <br />c) Site 302 is not shown on AHR Table 1 but is listed in Exhibit 8 <br />(Hydrologic Monitoring Program) of the C-81-071 permit renewal <br />application. <br />CYCC Response <br />b~ The correction will be incorporated into the 1992 AHR. <br />DOMG Concern <br />d) Sites S/2005, 14, 1002, 16, 302 are shown twice in the <br />hydrologic monitoring plan as having separate (or different) <br />monitoring requirements. Which is correct? <br />CYCC Response <br />The corrected permit pages are being submitted under separate cover <br />\~ letter for inclusion as part of the permit renewal which is <br />currently pending. <br />was ~~ G~- <br />~~ <br />