Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Harding Lawson Assodatea <br />HELP is a comprehensive quasi-two-dimensional hydrologic model of water movement across and <br />through repositories. The model accepts weather, soil and design data, then solves and tabulates surface <br />storage, lateral subsurface drainage, unsaturated vertical drainage, and leakage through soil layers. The <br />model enables the user to estimate runoff, evapotranspiration, percolation, and leakage. The program was <br />developed by the COE for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Risk Reduction <br />Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH. HELP Version I was initially released in 1984, and has since <br />become the national standard for landfill and repository design modeling. <br />Climate data for the model was obtained from the NOAH National Weather Service station PAONIA <br />ISW located in Paonia, Colorado, 15 miles west of Somerset (see Appendix A). Monthly averages for <br />years 1957 through 1993 were used for the model. <br />' Exposed refuse was given the same permeability and texture of coarse gravel. The HELP model used an <br />SCS runoff curve number of 60 for the exposed coal refuse. In addition, a level surface was used for the <br />exposed refuse to limit surface runoff. The model was run fora 10-year period to allow steady state <br />moisture conditions to establish and to simulate conditions over the operational lifespan of the LRP. The <br />' model consisted of three horizontal layers: <br />' 1) an 80-feet thick layer of new refuse, with hydraulic conductivity characteristics of coarse gravel; <br />2) an 80-feet thick layer of old refuse, with hydraulic characteristics of silty clay; and <br />3) an alluvial soils foundation. <br />' The model generated an estimated water storage (perched water table) maximum height of 5-feet in the <br />upper, newer refuse after l0-years of simulation. This estimate is conservative as it assumes all stored <br />' water in the upper layer will accumulate at the old/new refuse contact, and does not account for surface <br />runoff on the reclaimed portions of the LRP. The model also predicted a water mound of 22-feet <br />perched atop the alluvial contact along the base of the lower, older refuse. This prediction compares <br />reasonably well with the 27-feet perched mound estimate made when the LRP was originally permitted <br />(Exhibit 51, July, 1981). The original estimate did not account for vertical percolation into the alluvial <br />subsoils, making it larger and more conservative. Ground water level information from monitoring <br />' well GP-1 and piezometer GB-1 at the base of the LRP eastern flank show groundwater is not <br />mounding within the lower older refuse material. This indicates that the underdrains and french drains <br />are effectively removing the groundwater and alluvial soils are more hydraulically conductive than <br />assumed. All models are presented in Appendix B. <br />SLOPE STABILITY MODELING USING 5-FEET HIGH PERCHED WATER TABLE <br />' A 5-feet thick horizontal perched ground water table was incorporated into the original slope stability <br />model used during the July, 1996 analysis. The model used the worst case upper refuse conditions <br />where the entire mass consisted of 10% fines and had zero cohesion. The results produced are <br />presented in Table 1. All slope stability calculations are presented in Appendix C. <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />